Final analysis of the TiNivo-2 phase 3 trial: Long-term outcome of tivozanib (Tivo) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
Abstract
4555 Background: TiNivo-2 results showed that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge did not offer benefit to patients with mRCC, regardless of treatment sequencing ( Lancet , 2024; 404:1309). However, the data highlights activity for Tivo monotherapy in the post-ICI setting. Long term outcomes of the TiNivo-2 study are reported here. Methods: TiNivo-2 trial design and primary-endpoint results were previously reported: patients with mRCC were randomized to treatment with Tivo 0.89 mg once daily for 21/28 days plus Nivolumab (Nivo) at 480 mg every four weeks (Tivo/Nivo) or Tivo 1.34 mg once daily for 21/28 days. Here, long term progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the safety profile are reported at final analysis. Results: At the data cutoff of 17 October 2025, 172 patients were randomized to Tivo (171 treated) and 171 patients were randomized to Tivo/Nivo (168 treated); median (m) follow up was 28.4 mo (95% CI 27.0-29.8) in Tivo versus 27.2 months (mo) (95% CI 26.1-28.5) in Tivo/Nivo. Survival outcomes and hazard ratios (HR) for the ITT population, 2L, and 3L populations are summarized in Table 1. In 2L, mPFS favored Tivo over Tivo/Nivo (9.23 mo [7.29, 11.04] vs 5.95 mo [5.42, 7.95]). Across subgroups, there were no differences in mOS. No new safety signals were observed with prolonged administration; the most common ≥ Grade 3 TEAE was hypertension occurring in 39 (22.8%) and 38 (22.6%) and of patients in the Tivo and Tivo/Nivo groups respectively. Other ≥ Grade 3 TEAEs included diarrhea (2.3% and 3.6%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (0.6% and 1.2%) in the Tivo and Tivo/Nivo groups respectively. Treatment Related SAEs occurred in 15 (8.8%) and 18 (10.7%) of patients in Tivo and Tivo/Nivo groups respectively. Conclusions: This final analysis of patients in the TiNivo-2 study highlights the sustained efficacy Tivo in mRCC with a consistent safety profile. Together, these findings support durable clinical benefit and tolerability of Tivo in the post-ICI treatment setting in RCC, an area of high unmet need (NCT04987203). Clinical trial information: NCT04987203 . Parameter By ITT 2L setting 3L setting Tivo (0.89mg) /Nivo (n=171) Tivo (1.34mg) (n=172) Tivo (0.89mg) /Nivo (n=111) Tivo (1.34mg)(n=105) Tivo (0.89mg) /Nivo (n=60) Tivo (1.34mg)(n=67) mPFS, months (95% CI) 5.72(4.37-7.43) 7.43(5.52-9.23) 5.95(5.42, 7.95) 9.23(7.29, 11.04) 5.45(3.15, 9.56) 5.44(2.10, 7.36) mPFS HR 0.96 (0.76, 1.21) 1.08 (0.80, 1.46) 0.77 (0.52, 1.15) mOS, months (95% CI) 23.85(19.71-NR) 22.93 (18.14-NR) 29.50(21.06, NR) 23.52(18.33, NR) 19.71(10.81, 31.90) 22.70(11.79, NR) mOS HR 0.95 (0.70, 1.28) 0.78 (0.53, 1.16) 1.13 (0.70, 1.81) NR, not reached.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Robert J. Motzer
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Bradley Alexander McGregor
Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Laurence Albiges
Department of Medical Oncology Gustave Roussy Villejuif France
Javier Molina Cerrillo
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
Philippe Barthélémy
Maria T. Bourlon
Urologic Oncology Clinic, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
Benjamin Garmezy
Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN
Sheik Emambux
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
Arnab Basu
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
Raffaele Ratta
Hopital Foch, Suresnes, France
Pedro C. Barata
Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
Jeffrey Thomas Yorio
Texas Oncology, Austin, TX
Helen Moon
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Alex Chehrazi-Raffle
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
Roberto Iacovelli
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome
Ralph J. Hauke
Nebraska Cancer Specialists, Omaha, NE
Rana R. McKay
Department of Medicine, Urology, and Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California‐San Diego La Jolla California USA
Kathryn E. Beckermann
Department of Medicine Tennessee Oncology Nashville Tennessee USA
Moshe C. Ornstein
Toni K. Choueiri
Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA