FGFR-targeted therapies in advanced esophagogastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

M Muzammil Khan Z Zobia Farooq (King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan) J Juhi Ardeshna-Chovatiya (University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA) M Muhammad Mohsin Sial (2Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan) I Ibrahim Khamees (2University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, United States) M Muhammad Shaheer Mannan (8Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, United States) M Muhammad Kashif Amin (2The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States) M Muhammad Umair Mushtaq (1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS) M Moazzam Shahzad (10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States)

Abstract

e16053 Background: Esophagogastric cancer carries high mortality, with most patients diagnosed at advanced stages. In HER2-negative disease, chemotherapy ± nivolumab is standard, but yields limited survival. Alterations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway are present in 5-10% of gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer and confer aggressive biology. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of FGFR inhibitors as second line agents in adults with advanced or metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2025. Studies evaluating FGFR inhibitors in adults with advanced or metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma were included. Efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted. We pooled the outcomes using a random-effects inverse-variance meta-analysis of proportions, with heterogeneity quantified by I². Analyses were conducted in R. Results: Our study comprised three articles with a total of 195 patients, including 145 (74.4%) males and 50 (25.6%) females, with a median age of 61.3 (59–65) years. Patients had advanced, metastatic, or unresectable esophagogastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and were treated with FGFR-targeted agents as a second line therapy: pemigatinib in 8 patients (6.8%), bemarituzumab in combination with FOLFOX in 77 patients (65.8%), and nintedanib in 32 patients (27.4%). 40 (34.2%) patients had prior trastuzumab therapy. Baseline performance status was good (ECOG 0–1) across studies. Median follow-up was 18 (10.9–28.3) months. Pooled overall response rate was 34% (95% CI, 7–79%; I² = 72.3%). Bemarituzumab significantly improved overall survival compared with placebo (HR 0.58), while median OS in single-arm cohorts was 8.2 months with pemigatinib and 14.2 months with nintedanib. Median progression-free survival ranged from 1.9 to 9.5 months across studies, with the longest PFS observed in the bemarituzumab cohort. Pooled overall mortality was 49% (95% CI, 12–87%; I² = 82%). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were variably reported and included neutropenia, stomatitis, hypertension, and corneal disorders. Notably, no grade 3 or worse adverse events, treatment-related mortality, or discontinuations were reported in the pemigatinib cohort (small, early-terminated study). Conclusions: FGFR-targeted therapies show activity in FGFR-altered esophagogastric cancers, especially with FGFR2b-directed monoclonal antibodies. Toxicities are manageable, but responses vary, highlighting the need for molecular selection. Larger trials are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit and optimal treatment sequencing.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

M

Muzammil Khan

Z

Zobia Farooq

King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

J

Juhi Ardeshna-Chovatiya

University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA

M

Muhammad Mohsin Sial

2Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan

I

Ibrahim Khamees

2University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, United States

M

Muhammad Shaheer Mannan

8Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, United States

M

Muhammad Kashif Amin

2The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States

M

Muhammad Umair Mushtaq

1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

M

Moazzam Shahzad

10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States