Fertility concerns, counseling, and preservation in AYA females with early-stage breast cancer: Chemotherapy receipt and timing.

B Bolun Liu (5Department of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Mankato, MN) H Hazel Nichols (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States) J Jia Li C Cecile Laurent (Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, CA) T Theresa Keegan (3University of California, Davis, Sacramento, United States) J Jessica Chubak (Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA) M Mallory Casperson (Cactus Cancer Society, Oakland, CA) L Laura Green (NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom) R Renata Abrahao (University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA) C Chun Chao (Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA) C Candice Sauder (University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA) K Karen J. Wernli (Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA) E Erin Elizabeth Hahn (Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Department of Research & Evaluation, Pasadena, CA) L Lawrence H. Kushi K Kathryn Jean Ruddy (Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN)

Abstract

1564 Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) females with early-stage ER-negative and/or HER2-positive breast cancer commonly receive chemotherapy to reduce risk of recurrence. Fertility concerns, counseling, and preservation may influence chemotherapy decisions and time to chemotherapy (TTC) initiation. Methods: We surveyed AYA survivors of stage I–III premenopausal ER-negative and/or HER2-positive breast cancer treated at Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California (2013-2022). Fertility concerns were defined as not having completed desired family size or being unsure about having completed desired family size at diagnosis. We summarized receipt of fertility counseling, receipt of chemotherapy, and use of oocyte/embryo cryopreservation for fertility preservation (FP). Among fertility-concerned patients who received chemotherapy, TTC (days from diagnosis) was assessed separately for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) vs for adjuvant chemotherapy (AdjC). Time to NAC was natural log–transformed and modeled with multivariable log-linear regression to estimate relative differences in TTC, adjusting for stage, study site, ER, HER2, age, and diagnosis year. Results: Of 363 respondents, 197 (54%) had fertility concerns at diagnosis; 183/197 (93%) received chemotherapy, similar to 153/166 (92%) among those without concerns (p=0.7). Of the concerned chemotherapy recipients, 45 (25%) saw a fertility specialist but did not pursue FP while 55 (30%) underwent FP. For the 112 fertility-concerned NAC recipients, FP was associated with longer TTC than no fertility specialist counseling (mean=41 vs. 30 days; adjusted ratio=1.39; 95% CI 1.15–1.69), whereas fertility specialist counseling without FP was not (mean= 31 vs. 30 days, adjusted ratio=1.04; 95% CI 0.86–1.25). For the 71 fertility-concerned AdjC recipients, TTC was similar for patients who did not see a fertility specialist (mean=63 days), those who froze oocytes/embryos (mean=65 days), and those who saw a fertility specialist but did not pursue FP (mean=69 days). Conclusions: In this AYA breast cancer cohort, there was no evidence that fertility concerns led patients to decline chemotherapy. FP was associated with a modest delay in NAC initiation (<2 weeks on average). Time to chemotherapy (TTC) among 183 AYA patients with ER− and/or HER2+ breast cancer and fertility concerns. Fertility-focused care N (n=183) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=112) Mean TTC, days Relative difference in TTC, adjusted ratio (95%CI) Adjuvant chemotherapy (n=71) Mean TTC, days No fertility counseling from a specialist 83 (45%) 55 (49%) 29.6 Reference 28 (39%) 62.6 Received fertility counseling from a specialist No fertility preservation 45 (25%) 28 (25%) 30.7 1.04 (0.86,1.25) 17 (24%) 68.6 Fertility preservation 55 (30%) 29 (26%) 41.2 1.39 (1.15,1.69) 26 (37%) 64.6

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 1564-1564
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

B

Bolun Liu

5Department of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Mankato, MN

H

Hazel Nichols

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

J

Jia Li

C

Cecile Laurent

Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, CA

T

Theresa Keegan

3University of California, Davis, Sacramento, United States

J

Jessica Chubak

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA

M

Mallory Casperson

Cactus Cancer Society, Oakland, CA

L

Laura Green

NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol, United Kingdom

R

Renata Abrahao

University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA

C

Chun Chao

Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA

C

Candice Sauder

University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA

K

Karen J. Wernli

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA

E

Erin Elizabeth Hahn

Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Department of Research & Evaluation, Pasadena, CA

L

Lawrence H. Kushi

K

Kathryn Jean Ruddy

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN