Favorable impact of patient's selection on outcome of Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma treated with idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy; Experience in french patients (Super-FENIX): An IFM study from the descar-T registry
Abstract
Abstract Idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) is the first chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) approved by both the European Medicines Agency and the US FDA. Ide-cel has been first available in France since April 2021 through the Early Access Program for treatment of patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) having received at least 3 therapies including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody and then via commercial access from November 2024. Here we present an update of characteristics and outcomes of pts enrolled in this program. It is a multicenter, retrospective, observational study that included all consecutive pts with RRMM registered in the DESCAR-T database treated with commercial Ide-cel from April 2021 to February 2025. The main objective was to analyze efficacy in terms of response rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients' characteristics and outcomes were analyzed according to two periods: cohort A (April-2021 to April-2023, n=175) and cohort B (May-2023 to February-2025, n=596) corresponding to the first two years with limited open center (n=11) and slot availability and the second one, with unlimited access and increased center number (Nb) (n=29). Secondary objectives were evaluation of safety including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity (ICAN), cytopenia, infection, and second primary malignancies (SPM). 915 pts were included of whom 115 (13%) were not infused and 29 were infused after February 2025. Median age of the 771 infused pts (58% male) was 66 years (range: 29-85) and was superior in cohort B (66.9 y) as compared to cohort A (61.7 y). Median Nb of prior lines of therapies was 3 (range: 0-13). More pts had received <2 lines in cohort B (122/596 [20%] vs 5/175 [3%], p<0.0001). Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage 3 was noted in 21% of pts, 37% had high risk cytogenetic abnormalities defined by del(17p) or t(4;14), and high tumor burden (>30% bone marrow plasma cells) was present in 53%, similarly in both cohorts. Triple- (n=559, 73%) and penta-refractory pts (n=168, 22%) were lower in cohort B (69% vs. 83%, p<0.0001 and 19% vs. 31%, p=0.01, respectively). Extramedullary disease (EMD) was observed in 73/764 (10%) of pts and was lower in cohort B (45/589, 8% vs. 28/175, 16%). Overall, 162 pts (21%) did not meet at least one of the KarMMa inclusion criteria. 630 pts (82%) had bridging therapy of which 188(34%) responded (106 partial response [PR]; 50 very good partial response [VGPR]; 32 complete response [CR]). Median vein-to-vein time was 56 days (range: 39-357) and was superior in cohort A (61 vs 55 d, p<0.0001). Best overall response rate at M3 post Ide-cel was 89% (n=638), including CR, VGPR and PR in 299(42%), 192(27%) and 147(20%), respectively and was similar in both cohorts. In univariate analysis for best response >VGPR, only prior BCMA bispecific therapy had a negative impact (odds ratio: 0.35; 95% CI, 0.16 - 0.79). 264 pts (34%) progressed after Ide-cel of which 50% during the first 6 months (m) and 139 pts (18%) died, mostly of disease progression (73%). With a median follow-up after infusion of 11.8 m, median PFS was 14.8 m (95% CI, 12.6 - 16.8) and was similar in both cohorts (hazard ratio: 0.85, p=0.19). Pts achieving >VGPR at M3 post Ide-cel had a significantly better PFS (hazard ratio: 1.78; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.39, p=0.0001). The median OS was 38.9 m (95% CI, 34.2 – NR). In univariate analysis, EMD, ISS, prior bispecific and penta-refractoriness were negative factors for PFS and OS. CRS occurred in 677 (88%) pts (3% grade ≥3). ICAN occurred in 81 (11%) pts (2% with grade ≥3). 453 (59%) pts received tocilizumab in both cohorts. Persistent grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia, anemia and neutropenia at M1 were noted in 218 (28%), 112 (15%) and 378 (49%) pts, respectively. Infections in the first 6 m after Ide-cel occurred in 187 (24%) pts (grade ≥3: 33 [18%]). 24 pts developed SPM (4 AML and 6 MDS). This large study confirms safety and efficacy of Ide-cel in pts with RRMM in real- world settings across the 4-year period. Response rates, PFS and safety compares favorably to those reported in the registration trial and the real-world studies in the US. Overall, during both periods, selection of less advanced pts leads to a prolonged PFS and OS, never reported to date outside of clinical trial.
Article Details
Authors (37)
Bertrand Arnulf
Hôpital Universitaire St. Louis, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris
Jérôme Lambert
Biostatistics and Medical Information Department, Hôpital St. Louis, Paris
Lionel Karlin
Service Hématologie, Hôpital Universitaire Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
Cyrille Touzeau
Olivier Decaux
4Department of Hematology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
Aurore Perrot
Marie-Odile Petillon
6Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome, Lille, France
Denis Caillot
6Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, Hôpital Du Bocage, Dijon, France
Salomon Manier
Jean Marc Schiano De Colella
9Department of Hematology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
Mohamad Mohty
Laure Vincent
11Department of Hematology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
Karim Belhadj Merzoug
12Department of Hematology, Hopital Mondor, APHP, Creteil, France
Xavier Leleu
Service Hématologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
Cyrille Hulin
Service d’Hématologie, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
Michael Loschi
12Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
Lydia Montes
24Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Amiens, Amiens, France
Thomas Chalopin
Carine Chateleix
18Department of Hematology, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
Camille Bigenwald
19Department of Hematology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
Jean-Richard Eveillard
20Department of Hematology, Brest University Hospital, Brest, France
Yann Guillermin
21Department of Hematology, Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France
Fabrice Jardin
13CENTRE HENRI BECQUEREL, Rouen, France
Alexis Talbot
1APHP, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR 1342, Immno-hematologie, Paris, France
Anne Lazareth
1Hospices civils de Lyon, Clinical Hematology, Lyon, France
Jean-Noel Bastie
12University Hospital Dijon, Department of Clinical Hematology, Dijon, France
Stephanie Harel
1APHP, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR 1342, Immno-hematologie, Paris, France
Jill Corre
Unité Génomique du Myélome, Hôpital Universitaire de Toulouse Oncopole, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Roch Houot
21Service d’Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
Niels Moya
13Department of Oncology-Haematology and Cellular Therapy, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
Pierre Bories
8Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse – Oncopole, Toulouse, France
Titouan Cazaubiel
4Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
Noemie Bigot
1APHP, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR 1342, Immno-hematologie, Paris, France
Thierry Facon
6Department of Hematology, University Hospital and INSERM Unité Mixte de Recherche S1277, Lille, France
Hervé Avet-Loiseau
Unité Génomique du Myélome, Hôpital Universitaire de Toulouse Oncopole, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Benoit Ferment
1APHP, Université Paris Cité, INSERM UMR 1342, Immno-hematologie, Paris, France
Philippe Moreau