Facet‐Dependent Water Inhibition of Alkanol Dehydration on TiO <sub>2</sub> via Distinct Water–Alkanol Complexes

W Wenda Hu H Haiting Cai A Anthony Savoy (The Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering) J Jinshu Tian S Sungmin Kim F Fan Lin J Junrui Li (The Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering) H Hao Xu Y Yiqing Wu (Institute For Integrated Catalysis Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland Washington USA) Z Zihao Zhang (Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Tooth Restoration and Regeneration and Tongji Research Institute of Stomatology and Department of Implantology, Shanghai Tongji Stomatological Hospital and Dental School, Tongji University) N Nicholas Jaegers (The Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering Washington State University Pullman Washington USA) H Huamin Wang F Feng Gao J Jianzhi Hu (Institute for Integrated Catalysis) Y Yong Wang

Abstract

ABSTRACT Water is ubiquitous in biomass‐derived feeds, yet its molecular impact on oxygen‐elimination reactions remains poorly understood, particularly for catalysts exposing different facets. Here, we utilize well‐defined TiO 2 nanocrystals with dominant (101) and (001) facets to reveal a pronounced facet‐dependent effect of water, where inhibition for dehydration of isopropanol (IPA) on the TiO 2 (001) surface is about four times more severe than TiO 2 (101). Through a combination of in situ solid state NMR, in situ infrared spectroscopy, kinetics studies, and theoretical calculations, we demonstrate that this disparity arises from the formation of distinct alkanol‐water complex intermediates. On TiO 2 (001), IPA undergoes dissociative adsorption to form an isopropoxide‐H 2 O complex that readily drives the surface into a complex‐dominated regime. This pathway increases the activation barrier for C–H cleavage by 40 kJ mol −1 by inducing a disordered transition state. In contrast, TiO 2 (101) favors molecular IPA adsorption with weak hydrogen bonding to water, resulting in a smaller complex formation constant and a much smaller activation barrier increase (25 kJ mol −1 ). By quantitatively linking facet‐dependent complex coverage to transition‐state destabilization, this work moves beyond simple site‐blocking models and provides a conceptual framework for designing catalysts that remain active in water‐containing environments.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 65, Issue 29
Published July 13, 2026
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (15)

W

Wenda Hu

H

Haiting Cai

A

Anthony Savoy

The Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering

J

Jinshu Tian

S

Sungmin Kim

F

Fan Lin

J

Junrui Li

The Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering

H

Hao Xu

Y

Yiqing Wu

Institute For Integrated Catalysis Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland Washington USA

Z

Zihao Zhang

Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Tooth Restoration and Regeneration and Tongji Research Institute of Stomatology and Department of Implantology, Shanghai Tongji Stomatological Hospital and Dental School, Tongji University

N

Nicholas Jaegers

The Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering Washington State University Pullman Washington USA

H

Huamin Wang

F

Feng Gao

J

Jianzhi Hu

Institute for Integrated Catalysis

Y

Yong Wang