Exploring hemodynamic measurements from the Tromsø Study for prediction of cardiovascular disease using traditional statistical models and machine learning approaches

N Naomi Azulay B Bjørn-Jostein Singstad H Henrik Schirmer (Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo) M Maja-Lisa Løchen R Roy Bjørkholt Olsen T Trond Geir Jenssen A Audun Stubhaug C Christopher Sivert Nielsen L Leiv Arne Rosseland C Christian Tronstad

Abstract

Abstract In Norway, NORRISK2 is the government-recommended risk model for predicting an individual’s 10-year probability of getting cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aims to investigate the potential for improvement of CVD prediction by using hemodynamic measurements from a non-invasive beat-to-beat blood pressure monitor, taken as part of pain sensitivity assessment with the cold-pressor test (CPT) during the Tromsø6 Study (2007–2008). Using 6694 recordings, ultra-short-term pulse rate variability (PRV) and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) obtained during the CPT were added as additional variables into the existing NORRISK2 survival model (extended model). In addition, the time-series data was used in a machine learning (ML) model without the NORRISK2 background variables. Both models were compared to a recalibration of the original NORRISK2 model. The predictions from the recalibrated NORRISK2 model and the ML model were then combined with logistic regression. The statistical models performed similarly on the test set, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.71–0.86), 0.79 (0.71–0.85) and 0.77 (0.69–0.84) (original, recalibrated and extended NORRISK2, respectively). The ML model using only hemodynamic measurements obtained a test set AUROC of 0.73 (0.67–0.80). Combining the NORRISK2 and ML model did not increase the AUROC. Adding ultra-short-term PRV and BRS derived from Tromsø6 did not improve the prediction of the NORRISK2 model either. Although with lower accuracy, the beat-to-beat time series of hemodynamic variables from a CPT had a significant (p < 0.01) ability to predict future CVD without any other person-specific data.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 1, Issue 1
Published June 13, 2026
ISSN 2045-2322
Publisher Nature Portfolio

Journal Info

Scientific Reports

Nature Portfolio

ISSN: 2045-2322 Open Access Life Sciences

Authors (10)

N

Naomi Azulay

B

Bjørn-Jostein Singstad

H

Henrik Schirmer

Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo

M

Maja-Lisa Løchen

R

Roy Bjørkholt Olsen

T

Trond Geir Jenssen

A

Audun Stubhaug

C

Christopher Sivert Nielsen

L

Leiv Arne Rosseland

C

Christian Tronstad