Exploratory ctDNA analyses for the EVOKE-1 study in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC).
Abstract
8522 Background: In NSCLC, ctDNA analysis complements assessment of clinical efficacy and identifies molecular alterations that may be prognostic or predictive of treatment. EVOKE-1 compared sacituzumab govitecan (SG) vs docetaxel in mNSCLC that had progressed on platinum-based and anti–PD-(L)1 therapy. Although statistical significance was not met, SG showed numerical improvement in overall survival (OS) vs docetaxel. Here, we assessed the value of ctDNA as a biomarker in available samples from EVOKE-01. Methods: The biomarker evaluable population (BEP) comprised 497 patients (pts), representing 82% of the ITT population. Cell-free DNA was extracted from blood collected at baseline and cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1). Samples were analyzed using the Guardant Infinity assay, a tumor-agnostic platform that measures ctDNA levels and gene variants from a comprehensive gene panel. Results: ctDNA was detected at baseline in 449 pts (90.3% of BEP), and higher ctDNA was a negative prognostic for OS, regardless of treatment. mOS was 12.7 vs 10.0 mos (HR 1.58, 95% CI: 1.11–2.26) for < vs ≥ median ctDNA level with SG and 10.8 vs 7.2 mos (HR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.28–2.46) with docetaxel. ctDNA was undetectable in 48 pts who had a longer survival (mOS NR in either arm) than those with detected ctDNA. At C2D1, median ctDNA reduction was 59% and 75% with SG and docetaxel ( P =.33); ≥50% reduction was achieved in 103 (44%) vs 121 pts (51%), respectively. Changes in ctDNA levels at C2D1 were prognostic, with pts achieving ≥50% reduction having a longer OS than those with <50% reduction of ctDNA. Actionable genomic alterations identified included KRAS , EGFR , ALK , ROS , ERBB2 , MET , and NTRK alterations. As expected from the required local/central testing for mutations at study entry, only a small number of pts with EGFR/ALK alterations were identified. KRAS mutations had a negative prognostic effect, whereas the group of pts with EGFR/ALK/ROS alterations was too small for conclusive results. Analysis of mutations ( TP53 , KEAP1 , STK11 ) potentially contributing to anti–PD-(L)1 resistance showed that between SG and docetaxel, 167 (68%) and 171 pts (68%) had TP53 mutations and 184 (75%) and 194 pts (77%) had ≥1 of these 3 mutations. The frequency of these mutations was similar across pts with PD/SD and those with CR/PR as best response to last prior PD-(L)1 therapy. Harboring TP53 mutations was a negative prognostic factor in both arms: mOS was 11.3 mos vs NA (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.11–2.54) with TP53 mutation vs wildtype with SG and 9.2 vs 13.9 mos (HR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.18–2.47), respectively, with docetaxel. KEAP1/STK11 mutations were also negative prognostic markers. Conclusions: This analysis did not identify differences in ctDNA clearance with SG vs docetaxel. Regardless of treatment and in line with previous reports, high ctDNA was a negative prognostic marker for OS in mNSCLC. Furthermore, alterations of KRAS , TP53 , and KEAP1/STK11 represent negative prognostic factors. Clinical trial information: NCT05089734 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Enriqueta Felip
Medical Oncology Service, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona
Peiwen Kuo
Pilar Garrido
Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
Christos Chouaid
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil (CHIC), Centre de Recherche Clinique, Creteil, France
Yvonne J. Summers
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
Marcello Tiseo
Shan Tang
Frontiers Science Center for Transformative Molecules, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Linda Su-Feher
Gilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA
Riddhi Patel
Sabeen Mekan
Juliane Margarete Jürgensmeier
GIlead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA
Giannis Socrates Mountzios
Fourth Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Trials Unit, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece