Exploratory biomarker analysis of ociperlimab (OCI) plus tislelizumab (TIS) in patients (pts) with PD-L1–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in AdvanTIG-105.
Abstract
2571 Background: OCI (anti-TIGIT) plus TIS (anti-PD-1) may enhance antitumor immune responses in advanced solid tumors. We present a retrospective biomarker analysis of pts in AdvanTIG-105 (NCT04047862), a phase 1/1b open-label study of OCI plus TIS for treatment-naïve metastatic non-squamous (NSQ) and squamous (SQ) PD-L1-positive (TC ≥1%) NSCLC. Methods: Pts in cohort 3 (n=46) were treated with 900 mg OCI plus 200 mg TIS. Pts in cohort 10 (n=68) were treated with 450 mg (Arm A), 900 mg (Arm B), or 1800 mg (Arm C) OCI plus 200 mg TIS. Baseline tumor tissue was used to measure PD-L1 and TIGIT expression (SP263 and SP410 IHC assays). Gene expression profiling (GEP) was performed using TrueSeq RNA Access (Illumina); gene signature scores were evaluated with ssGSEA. Progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratio (HR) was calculated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: At Aug 2024 data cutoff, median follow-up was 19.7 months (range: 0.7-41.6 mo) for cohort 3 and 9.8 mo (range: 0.3-21.4 mo) for cohort 10. Baseline characteristics, overall response rate (ORR), and PFS were comparable across cohorts and between biomarker-evaluable and intent-to-treat (ITT) pts. PD-L1 ≥25% vs <25% and TIGIT ≥5% vs <5% subgroups were associated with a trend toward higher ORR and longer PFS, with greater increment in pts with NSQ- vs SQ-NSCLC (Table). PD-L1/TIGIT double high subgroup showed further enriched clinical efficacy in NSCLC (Table). Anti-TIGIT mechanism of action-related GEP signatures (NK cells, Treg, macrophages) were associated with a trend toward longer PFS primarily in pts with NSQ-NSCLC. Conclusions: Pts with NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥25%, TIGIT ≥5%, or PD-L1/TIGIT double high can achieve a trend toward longer PFS and higher ORR than PD-L1 low or TIGIT low subgroups when treated with OCI plus TIS. Longer PFS in PD-L1 ≥25% or TIGIT ≥5% subgroups in NSQ- vs SQ-NSCLC may be associated with biological differences in histology. Confirmation of these results will require prospective evaluation of OCI plus TIS in randomized studies. Clinical trial information: NCT04047862 . Subgroup mPFS (mo) ORR (%) NSCLC Evaluable pts (n=113) 5.5 34.5 PD-L1 ≥25% vs <25%(n=57 vs 56) 6.9 vs 4.2HR 0.58 (95% CI: 0.37-0.9) 47 vs 22 TIGIT ≥5% vs <5%(n=62 vs 48) 6.8 vs 4.1HR 0.64 (95% CI: 0.41-1) 45 vs 19 PD-L1/TIGIT double positive vs other(n=38 vs 72) 8.3 vs 4.2HR 0.53 (95% CI: 0.33-0.86) 55 vs 22 NSQ-NSCLC PD-L1 ≥25% vs <25%(n=35 vs 32) 8.3 vs 4.2HR 0.55 (95% CI: 0.32-0.98) 49 vs 19 TIGIT ≥5% vs <5%(n=36 vs 29) 6.5 vs 4.1HR 0.53 (95% CI: 0.3-0.94) 50 vs 14 SQ-NSCLC PD-L1 ≥25% vs <25%(n=22 vs 24) 5.5 vs 5.3HR 0.63 (95% CI: 0.35-1.29) 45 vs 25 TIGIT ≥5% vs <5%(n=26 vs 19) 5.5 vs 5.5HR 0.93 (95% CI: 0.46-1.87) 38 vs 26
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (13)
Yan Yu
Department of Respiratory Oncology Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin China
Yanyan Peng
BeOne Medicines Ltd, Shanghai, China
Wei Tan
Guohua Yu
Jun Zhang
Se Hyun Kim
Han Yan
Hanying Li
Yun Zhang
Zinan Bao
BeOne Medicines Ltd, Shanghai, China
Yunxia Zuo
BeOne Medicines Ltd, Shanghai, China
David S. Shames
Shun Lu