Explaining the Relationships Between Age, Endocrine Therapy Persistence, and Risk of Recurrence in Hormone Receptor–Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Nationwide Cohort Study

E Elise Dumas (Institut Curie, Paris, France) F Floriane Jochum (Institut Curie - Institut Hospitalo Universitaire - Women's Cancer, Paris, France) F Florence Coussy (Institut Curie, Paris, France) A Anne-Sophie Hamy (Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France) A Alena Majdling (Centre René Hughenin, Medical Oncology Department, Saint Cloud, France) S Sophie Houzard (Health Data and Assessment, Health Survey Data Science and Assessment Division, French National Cancer Institute (Institut National du Cancer INCa), Boulogne-Billancourt, France) C Christine Le Bihan-Benjamin (Health Data and Assessment, Health Survey Data Science and Assessment Division, French National Cancer Institute (Institut National du Cancer INCa), Boulogne-Billancourt, France) F Fabien Reyal P Paul Gougis (Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, INSERM U1136, CLIP2 Galilée (P.G.)) M Mats Julius Stensrud (Institute of Mathematics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland)

Abstract

PURPOSE Young age is associated with increased risk of recurrence in hormone receptor (HR)–positive early-stage breast cancer (eBC). Lack of adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) is a potential reason for the lower survival proportions observed in younger patients, but the survival benefits of improving adherence to ET in young patients remain unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using data from the French National Health Data System and target trial emulation methods, we considered three sustained ET persistence strategies (allowing treatment gaps of no more than 30, 90, or 180 continuous days) and estimated the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) benefit of sustained ET persistence compared with observed ET persistence. RESULTS A total of 121,601 patients with HR-positive eBC were included in the analyses, of whom 29.8% was younger than 50 years at diagnosis. Younger patients had lower DFS and were more likely to discontinue ET than older patients. In patients 34 years and younger, strict ET persistence (≤30-day gaps) improved 5-year DFS proportions from 74.5% to 78.8% (4.3 percentage points [95% CI, 2.6 to 7.2]) compared with observed persistence. ET persistence strategies allowing for ≤90-day and ≤180-day gaps reduced the 5-year DFS benefit in patients 34 years and younger to 1.3 (95% CI, 0.2 to 3.7) and 1.0 (95% CI, –0.2 to 3.4) percentage points, respectively. By contrast, DFS benefits of improved ET persistence in patients after 50 years old did not exceed 1.9 percentage points, compared with observed persistence, regardless of the persistence definition. CONCLUSION The survival benefit that could be achieved with strict ET persistence in women 34 years and younger with HR-positive eBC highlights the need for tailored strategies to improve ET persistence in this population.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 1863-1874
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (10)

E

Elise Dumas

Institut Curie, Paris, France

F

Floriane Jochum

Institut Curie - Institut Hospitalo Universitaire - Women's Cancer, Paris, France

F

Florence Coussy

Institut Curie, Paris, France

A

Anne-Sophie Hamy

Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France

A

Alena Majdling

Centre René Hughenin, Medical Oncology Department, Saint Cloud, France

S

Sophie Houzard

Health Data and Assessment, Health Survey Data Science and Assessment Division, French National Cancer Institute (Institut National du Cancer INCa), Boulogne-Billancourt, France

C

Christine Le Bihan-Benjamin

Health Data and Assessment, Health Survey Data Science and Assessment Division, French National Cancer Institute (Institut National du Cancer INCa), Boulogne-Billancourt, France

F

Fabien Reyal

P

Paul Gougis

Department of Medical Oncology, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, INSERM U1136, CLIP2 Galilée (P.G.)

M

Mats Julius Stensrud

Institute of Mathematics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland