Examining the tumor microbiology and microenvironment of patients with triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer receiving KEYNOTE-522.
Abstract
e12594 Background: Patients with Stage III triple negative (TN) inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) are treated based on standard-of-care practices inclusive of the Keynote 522 regimen (KN522). Outcomes, however, are inferior to what has been reported in the non-IBC setting. Patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) were compared to those not achieving pCR in a cohort of patients with IBC receiving KN522 to evaluate for predictors of response. Methods: RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on 26 samples from 23 patients with IBC undergoing KN522 in the neoadjuvant setting (N = 19 baseline pre-treatment, N = 7 surgical post treatment, N = 5 paired samples). BostonGene’s Breast Cancer Classifier (BCC) was utilized to determine intrinsic subtypes. Tumor microenvironment was determined by BostonGene’s Tumor Portrait assay. Results: Among patients achieving pCR in the studied cohort (N = 4), 75% (N = 3) and 25% (N = 1) patients had basal and luminal B subtype, respectively, while in the non-pCR group (N = 5), 30% (N = 3) were HER2-low. The pCR group demonstrated higher PD-L1 RNA-seq expression and a trend towards higher abundance of T cell subsets in the tumor cell microenvironment comparatively. Among non-pCR cases, deconvolution analysis revealed reduced tumor fractions following neoadjuvant systemic therapy. A shift in tumor portrait was observed in 3/5 samples, including increased fibrosis features in two cases and loss of immune component in one. These non-pCR cases showed increased angiogenesis and endothelial enrichment signatures, trending toward reduced matrix remodeling. No association was identified between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and either pCR or BCC subtype. Conclusions: While the small sample size and molecular heterogeneity preclude our ability to draw definitive conclusions, our findings show that in TN IBC, response to neoadjuvant therapy correlated with high PD-L1 expression and T cell abundance, whereas non-responders demonstrated angiogenic and endothelial shifts. No association was observed between irAEs and pCR or BCC. These findings highlight potential biomarkers of response and progression in TN IBC; however, interpretation is limited by the small cohort size and molecular heterogeneity.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Azadeh Nasrazadani
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Bora Lim
Angela Alexander
Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Morgan Welch IBC Clinic and Research Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Bisrat G. Debeb
Rachel M. Layman
Department of Breast Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
Vicente Valero
Breast Medical Oncology Department, Morgan Welch IBC Clinic and Research Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Savitri Krishnamurthy
Anthony Lucci
Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Morgan Welch Inflammatory Breast Cancer Clinic and Research Program, Houston, TX
Terry Lynn Arnold
The IBC Network Foudation, Houston, TX
Irina Bulusheva
BostonGene, Waltham, MA
Viktor Smirnov
2BostonGene, 100 Beaver St, United States
Oleg Baranov
BostonGene Corporation, Waltham, MA
Mariam Chalabyan
BostonGene, Waltham, MA
Michael Hensley
BostonGene Corporation, Waltham, MA
Nikita Kotlov
2BostonGene Corporation, Waltham, United States
Konstantin Chernyshov
1BostonGene Corporation, Waltham, United States
Aleksander Bagaev
12BostonGene Corporation, Waltham, MA
Michael F. Goldberg
BostonGene Corporation, Waltham, MA
Wendy A. Woodward