Ex vivo 3D micro-tumor testing platform for predicting clinical response to platinum-based therapy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

C Cornelis de Kroon (Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands) J Judith R. Kroep (Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands) P P. B. Ottevanger (Radboud University Medical Center, Medical BioSciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands) A Anne M. van Altena (Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands) E Els L. van Persijn-van Meerten (Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands) L Lieke J. Ceton (VitroScan, Leiden, Netherlands) T Timothy J.P. Sijsenaar (VitroScan BV, Leiden, Netherlands) E Esmee Koedoot (VitroScan, Leiden, Netherlands) D Dieudonné J. van der Meer (VitroScan BV, Leiden, Netherlands) W Willemijn Vader (VitroScan BV, Leiden, Netherlands)

Abstract

e17555 Background: While over 200,000 women are diagnosed with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) annually, primary treatment has not changed for decades and consists of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based therapy. However, around 20% of patients do not respond to this treatment. Unfortunately, predictive biomarkers for response to treatment are lacking. We present an innovative high throughput ex vivo 3D micro-tumor testing platform that predicts patient-specific response to different systemic treatments. Methods: Patients with HGSOC eligible for platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) were included in the study between 2019 and 2023 in the Netherlands (IRB P18.032, N=104). Micro-tumors enriched from ascites were embedded in hydrogel and exposed to carboplatin, paclitaxel and alternative therapies doxorubicin, gemcitabine, topotecan, olaparib and niraparib. Screening plates were imaged using a high-content 3D screening platform. Morphological features were extracted and fitted as dose-response curves. A linear regression model was trained on the AUCs of carboplatin and paclitaxel to predict the patient’s CA125 decay rates (N=38). Predicted CA125 decay rates were correlated to clinical outcomes (patient CA125 decay rate, change in target lesion size and progression-free survival). Throughput time was measured. Results: Ovarian cancer markers found in patient tumors were represented by isolated micro-tumors. CA125 decay rates predicted by ex vivo micro-tumor testing correlated to clinical patient responses with a correlation coefficient of 0.77 (R 2 =0.59). Moreover, predicted CA125 decay rates were significantly related to responses categorized according to gynaecological cancer intergroup (GCIG) guidelines (p<0.01 when comparing responders (CR/PR) to stable disease (SD)). Patients with high predicted sensitivity to NACT demonstrated significantly increased progression-free survival (p=0.02) and decreased target lesion size (R =-0.49). Complementary, patient-specific responses for second-line therapies were determined and presented in integrated reports. Sensitivity results could be generated within 2 weeks after sample collection. Conclusions: An ex vivo 3D micro-tumor testing platform has been established. Results are generated within 2 weeks after sample collection, aligning with the clinical time frame for treatment decision-making. The platform enabled prediction of clinical response to NACT in ovarian cancer patients with high accuracy (CR/PR vs SD/PD p < 0.01) and measured patient-specific responses to second-line therapies. In addition, patients with predicted high sensitivity to NACT demonstrated a significant survival benefit. Ongoing prospective evaluation of the clinical performance will further validate the application of the platform to support informed treatment decisions. Clinical trial information: P18.032 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (10)

C

Cornelis de Kroon

Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

J

Judith R. Kroep

Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

P

P. B. Ottevanger

Radboud University Medical Center, Medical BioSciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands

A

Anne M. van Altena

Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands

E

Els L. van Persijn-van Meerten

Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

L

Lieke J. Ceton

VitroScan, Leiden, Netherlands

T

Timothy J.P. Sijsenaar

VitroScan BV, Leiden, Netherlands

E

Esmee Koedoot

VitroScan, Leiden, Netherlands

D

Dieudonné J. van der Meer

VitroScan BV, Leiden, Netherlands

W

Willemijn Vader

VitroScan BV, Leiden, Netherlands