EVEREST-1: Safety and efficacy data of A2B530, a logic-gated Tmod chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy, in patients with solid tumors associated with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) expression and with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) loss of heterozygosity (LOH).

J Julian R. Molina (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) P Patrick Grierson (Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, MO) J Joel R. Hecht (David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) S Sandip Pravin Patel D Diane M. Simeone T Theodore H. Welling (University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA) K Kedar Kirtane M Maria Pia Morelli (Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Madappa N. Kundranda (Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ) D David G. Maloney (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States) F Frederick L Locke (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) M Marcela Valderrama Maus (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) M Marco L. Davila W William Y. Go (A2 Biotherapeutics, Inc., Agoura Hills, CA) K Kirstin B. Liechty (Tempus AI, Inc., Chicago, IL) W William Bretzlaff (A2 Biotherapeutics, Inc., Agoura Hills, CA) A Armen Mardiros (A2 Biotherapeutics, Inc., Agoura Hills, CA) A Antonious Ziad Hazim (Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, CA) M Matthew Ulrickson (28Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ) S Salman Rafi Punekar (NYU Langone Health, New York, NY)

Abstract

e16408 Background: A2B530 is a logic-gated CEA-targeting Tmod CAR T therapy being evaluated in the EVEREST-1 (NCT05736731) phase 1/2 study. Tmod CAR T therapy addresses challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity that have limited application of CAR T therapy to solid tumors (Tabernero, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017); through use of a CEA-targeted CAR-activating receptor combined with a blocking receptor recognizing HLA-A*02, A2B530 can distinguish between tumor and normal cells (Sandberg, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2022). Methods: Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors expressing CEA and tumor-associated HLA-A*02 LOH are enrolled through the ongoing prescreening study BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119). Eligible patients undergo leukapheresis and, when clinically appropriate, A2B530 is manufactured for the EVEREST-1 study. Patients undergo lymphodepletion before A2B530 infusion. The phase 1 dose escalation will evaluate safety, tolerability, manufacturing feasibility, and biomarkers starting at 1x10 8 Tmod positive cells (dose level [DL] 1) up to 6x10 8 cells and higher doses of lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC; DL 5). After the recommended phase 2 dose has been established, dose expansion will confirm safety and activity. Results: As of January 15, 2025, 14 total participants were enrolled on EVEREST-1 and had received A2B530 infusion at DLs 1-5, 4 (29%) with pancreatic (PANC) and 10 (71%) with colorectal cancer. Median age was 57 years (range, 34-76), with a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range, 1-6). LDC was well tolerated: neutropenia nadired at days 7-10, with recovery in all patients, and no significant episodes of prolonged cytopenia. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, grade > 3 serious adverse events (AEs), or episodes of related neurotoxicity. Most gastrointestinal AEs occurred early and were grade 1 or 2. One patient in DL 2 (2x10 8 cells) experienced possible grade 2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which started on day 15 and resolved with supportive therapy within 2 days; later the CRS diagnosis was confounded by a positive blood culture from the participant’s central line. The low rate of CRS is consistent with the low levels of serum cytokines measured up to 28 days post-infusion. Central response assessment has been completed for the 6 participants in DLs 1-2, with a partial response observed in 1 of 3 (33%) of participants with PANC. Peak expansion shows a possible dose response. Conclusions: Treatment with A2B530 was well tolerated, showing potential clinical efficacy and a potential dose response, although these are initial results. Maximum tolerated dose has not been reached, and dose escalation continues to determine the optimal phase 2 dosing of this treatment regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT05736731 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

J

Julian R. Molina

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

P

Patrick Grierson

Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, MO

J

Joel R. Hecht

David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA

S

Sandip Pravin Patel

D

Diane M. Simeone

T

Theodore H. Welling

University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA

K

Kedar Kirtane

M

Maria Pia Morelli

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Madappa N. Kundranda

Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ

D

David G. Maloney

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, United States

F

Frederick L Locke

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

M

Marcela Valderrama Maus

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

M

Marco L. Davila

W

William Y. Go

A2 Biotherapeutics, Inc., Agoura Hills, CA

K

Kirstin B. Liechty

Tempus AI, Inc., Chicago, IL

W

William Bretzlaff

A2 Biotherapeutics, Inc., Agoura Hills, CA

A

Armen Mardiros

A2 Biotherapeutics, Inc., Agoura Hills, CA

A

Antonious Ziad Hazim

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, CA

M

Matthew Ulrickson

28Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gilbert, AZ

S

Salman Rafi Punekar

NYU Langone Health, New York, NY