Event-free survival from the randomized phase 2 neoHIP trial evaluating neoadjuvant taxane, HER2-targeted therapy, +/- pembrolizumab in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

H Heather L. McArthur (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) S Stephanie Rice (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) I Isaac Chan (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) J Jorge Henrique Santos Leal (CLION / Grupo CAM, Salvador, Brazil) L Laura Spring (Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, MA) K Katherine Sanchez (New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM) J Jin Sun Bitar (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA) N Nisha Unni (Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) S Samira K. Syed (The University of Texas, Dallas, TX) R Reva K. Basho A Alison Katherine Conlin (Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR) S Sasha Stanton (Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR) K Kelly Perlewitz (Providence Cancer Institute, Newberg, OR) G Glenda Maria Delgado-Ramos (Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) N Namrata Peswani (UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) Y Yuan Yuan D DAVID CHAN (University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States) S Sujata Patil A Adam Brufsky (Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh) D David B. Page (Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR)

Abstract

623 Background: In early-stage HER2–positive breast cancer, achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy is strongly associated with improved event-free survival (EFS); however, a substantial proportion patients (pts) fail to achieve pCR, requiring subsequent adjuvant systemic therapy and remaining at higher risk for recurrence. Pembrolizumab (pembro) is well-tolerated, invigorates anti-tumor immunity, and may enhance response of chemotherapy and/or anti-HER2. We previously reported the positive primary outcome of the randomized phase 2 neoHIP trial, showing an improvement in pCR with the addition of pembro to neoadjuvant paclitaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (4 cycles, THP–pembro, pCR: 67% v. THP: 48%, p=.026). With long-term follow-up now mature, we now report EFS outcomes. Methods: Pts aged ≥ 18 years with stage II–III HER2–positive breast cancer were randomized, stratified by hormone receptor status and nodal status, to receive neoadjuvant THP or THP–pembro. EFS was defined as the time from randomization to progression of disease precluding surgery, local or distant recurrence, or death from any cause. EFS was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier (KM) method and compared between arms using a two-sided stratified log-rank test. Data were analyzed with a cutoff date of January 23, 2026. Results: Among 116 pts (58 per arm) randomized to THP +/- pembro, median follow-up was 37 months (range, 33–43). The 36-month EFS rate was 95% (95% CI, 89–100) for THP and 100% (95% CI, 100–100) for THP-pembro, with a trend towards significance (p=.099). Three EFS events were observed, all occurring in the THP arm, with one death related to recurrence and n=2/3 events occurring in patients with non-pCR. Conclusions: THP + pembro was associated with 100% EFS after a median follow-up of 37 months, whereas recurrences were observed in the THP arm, consistent with historical EFS expectations for neoadjuvant chemotherapy + dual HER2-targeted therapy. Although not powered for EFS, these findings support definitive evaluation of THP +/- pembro in a phase III trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03747120 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 623-623
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

H

Heather L. McArthur

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

S

Stephanie Rice

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

I

Isaac Chan

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

J

Jorge Henrique Santos Leal

CLION / Grupo CAM, Salvador, Brazil

L

Laura Spring

Massachusetts General Brigham, Boston, MA

K

Katherine Sanchez

New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM

J

Jin Sun Bitar

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

N

Nisha Unni

Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

S

Samira K. Syed

The University of Texas, Dallas, TX

R

Reva K. Basho

A

Alison Katherine Conlin

Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR

S

Sasha Stanton

Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR

K

Kelly Perlewitz

Providence Cancer Institute, Newberg, OR

G

Glenda Maria Delgado-Ramos

Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

N

Namrata Peswani

UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Y

Yuan Yuan

D

DAVID CHAN

University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States

S

Sujata Patil

A

Adam Brufsky

Hillman Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh

D

David B. Page

Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR