Evaluation of longitudinal image-derived AI prognostication as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in a phase 3 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) trial.
Abstract
1552 Background: Confidently anticipating an overall survival (OS) benefit in cancer care and therapeutic research is a defining challenge. AI tools may offer longitudinal measurements that predict OS differences objectively from existing data. Longitudinal imaging-based prognostication (IPRO-Δ), a fully automated deep learning system, was independently trained on real-world imaging data to predict survival from pairs of longitudinal computed tomography (CT) scans. Methods: We retrospectively assessed and compared how IPRO-Δ and percent change in RECIST sum of longest diameters (ΔSLD) predicted OS from 165 pairs of baseline and week 13 CT scans acquired in NExUS (NCT00449033), a phase 3 randomized controlled trial evaluating chemotherapy in combination with either sorafenib or placebo for first-line treatment of subjects with aNSCLC. The two study arms did not show a difference in OS and were combined for this analysis. To examine the association of IPRO-Δ and ΔSLD with OS, we measured the concordance index (c-index) and the standardized hazard ratios (HRs, change in risk for a one-standard-deviation increase in the marker). We also report median OS (mOS) for patients with partial response (PR, n = 60), stable disease (SD, n = 83) and progressive disease (PD, n = 22) at week 13, as defined by RECIST 1.1 guidelines (zero patients had a complete response). To explore the stratification potential of IPRO-Δ, we also define equivalent strata by ordering patients by their IPRO-Δ score and maintaining the same proportions (e.g., the top 60 patients by IPRO-Δ would be IPRO-PR, while the bottom 22 patients would be IPRO-PD), and report the mOS for these strata. Results: For the combined trial arms, median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 8.6 – 13.6), 108 (65.4%) were male, and 145 (87.9%) were diagnosed as stage IV. Table 1 reports the c-index, HR and stratified mOS values for both survival markers. Conclusions: At week 13 in NExUS, IPRO-Δ predicted OS differences significantly better than ΔSLD. Future work will explore how IPRO-Δ could serve as the basis for a surrogate endpoint in aNSCLC trials. Summary of association of IPRO-Δ and ΔSLD with OS. IPRO-Δ @ Week 13 (95% CI) ΔSLD @ Week 13 (95% CI) p -value C-Index 0.654 (0.604 – 0.713) 0.543 (0.495 – 0.599) <0.01 HR (1SD) 1.72 (1.38 – 2.15) 1.14 (0.94 – 1.38) <0.01 OS (months, PR / SD / PD or IPRO equivalent) 16.5 / 10.9 / 5.7 12.5 / 12.3 / 4.6 -
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Javier Montalt-Tordera
Bayer, Sant Joan Despi, Spain
Omar Farooq Khan
Breast Cancer Canada; POET Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
John Riskas
Altis Labs, Toronto, ON, Canada
Shahid Abbas Haider
Altis Labs, Toronto, ON, Canada
Vignesh Sivan
Altis Labs, Toronto, ON, Canada
Oleksandra Samorodova
Altis Labs, Toronto, ON, Canada
Thomas Jay Hennessy
Altis Labs, Toronto, ON, Canada
Sadegh Mohammadi
Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany
Emmanuelle DiTomaso
Bayer Pharmaceuticals US, Cambridge, MA
Topia Banerji
Bayer, Whippany, NJ
Felix Baldauf-Lenschen
Altis Labs, Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada
Charles Glaus
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, NJ