Evaluation of circulating kidney injury marker-1 (KIM-1) as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Post-hoc analysis of CheckMate 214.

W Wenxin Xu (Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA) S Sai Vikram Vemula (Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) R Robert J. Motzer (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York) A Aparna Chhibber (Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) D Deepthi Chowbene (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA) N Nahuel Perrot (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA) X Xiaowen Liu J Joseph Bonventre (Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) T Toni K. Choueiri (Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA) D David F. McDermott (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA) S Saurabh Gupta R Rupal Satish Bhatt (Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ)

Abstract

437 Background: CheckMate 214 established nivolumab and ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) as a first line standard of care regimen with superior survival and durable response versus sunitinib (SUN) in advanced RCC. Previous studies have shown that high levels of circulating KIM-1 are associated with worse prognosis and reduction in KIM-1 levels is associated with benefit from adjuvant immunotherapy. In this post-hoc analysis we evaluated whether KIM-1 levels at baseline and after 1 cycle of NIVO+IPI or SUN are associated with treatment outcomes in CheckMate 214. Methods: Patients with advanced RCC were randomized to NIVO+IPI or SUN as previously described. Serum KIM-1 was measured at baseline and 3 wks after first treatment dose using an enzyme based electrochemiluminescence assay. The association between KIM-1 levels and clinical outcomes was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses. Results: We analyzed serum from 821 patients (75% of the CM 214 ITT population). Median KIM-1 at baseline was 660.4 pg/mL. Across both arms, higher KIM-1 levels were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) independent of IMDC risk group, nephrectomy status, and tumor burden. Benefit for NIVO+IPI versus SUN was seen across KIM-1 tertiles. Decrease in KIM-1 from baseline to C2D1 was strongly associated with progression free survival (PFS) and OS among patients treated with NIVO+IPI (Median PFS 70.8 months vs 4.2 months for patients with >30% decrease vs >30% increase in KIM-1, with median OS 85.4 vs 26.6 months, overall response rate (ORR) 69.3 % vs 13.9%), but not in patients treated with SUN. Conclusions: In CheckMate 214, increased levels of baseline circulating KIM-1 were associated with worse clinical outcomes both in NIVO+IPI and SUN arms. The extent of reduction in serum KIM-1 just 3 wks after single cycle of NIVO+IPI was associated with long term efficacy of this IO doublet. Circulating KIM-1 may be a useful minimally invasive biomarker for monitoring patients on RCC immunotherapy. KIM-1 change at 3 weeks (prior to second dose of NIVO+IPI) and association with outcomes (NIVO+IPI arm). 3 week KIM-1 change N (%) ORR, % (95% CI) mPFS, months (95% CI) mOS, months (95% CI) >30% Decrease 140 (31.7) 69.29 (60.94-76.80) 70.80 (17.84- NA) 85.36 (63.08- NA) >10-30% Decrease 87 (19.7) 36.78 (26.69-47.80) 11.43 (6.28-18.20) 66.14 (40.44-80.10) <10% Change 86 (19.5) 30.23 (20.79-41.08) 15.41 (10.32-20.73) 52.70 (30.26-70.67) >10-30% Increase 56 (12.7) 23.21 (12.98-36.42) 7.13 (4.17-16.79) 40.34 (23.82-58.41) >30% Increase 72 (16.3) 13.89 (6.87-24.06) 4.17 (3.02-8.08) 26.61 (18.79-38.44)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 437-437
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

W

Wenxin Xu

Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

S

Sai Vikram Vemula

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

R

Robert J. Motzer

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

A

Aparna Chhibber

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

D

Deepthi Chowbene

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

N

Nahuel Perrot

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

X

Xiaowen Liu

J

Joseph Bonventre

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

T

Toni K. Choueiri

Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA

D

David F. McDermott

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA

S

Saurabh Gupta

R

Rupal Satish Bhatt

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ