Evaluation of a plasma cell-free DNA methylation-based multi-cancer detection test.
Abstract
10550 Background: Blood-based multi-cancer detection (MCD) tests hold promise for early cancer detection. MCD tests should demonstrate high specificity, clinically meaningful sensitivity, and provide information to guide clinical diagnostic evaluation. Methods: We developed an MCD test that leverages a next-generation sequencing epigenomics hybrid capture assay (Shield) to measure DNA methylation in regions differentially methylated across solid tumor cancers. We then implemented a two-step classification algorithm. First, a regression model (multi-cancer classifier) was trained to distinguish cancer from non-cancer samples at 98% target specificity. Next, a cancer signal of origin (CSO) model was trained to categorize 10 solid tumors (Table 1) in samples predicted to be cancer. The test was evaluated in a blinded case-control cohort of plasma samples (3mL; Streck) from adults with treatment naïve cancer, or who were self-reported cancer free with 1 year of follow-up (NCT05334069). Results: Final evaluable dataset was 962 participants (excludes 31 (3.1%) that failed quality control). Median age was 62 years (range: 40-78). 55% were female. Self-reported race was 81% White. Observed specificity was 98.6% (436/442). Sensitivity for the 10 cancer types included in the CSO model was 59.7% (224/375) and was 55.7% (263/472) overall when incorporating 4 solid tumor types not included in the CSO model. Primary or secondary CSO prediction was 92% accurate for the cancer types included (Table 1). Conclusions: In this cohort, this MCD test shows 59.7% sensitivity, 98.6% specificity, and 92% primary or secondary CSO accuracy for the cancer types included. Integrating an MCD test with an FDA approved blood-based CRC screening test may increase the MCD clinical value in the intended use population, which should be studied further. A version of this MCD test is being studied in a prospective, interventional study evaluating MCD testing feasibility. Overall and per cancer sensitivity and CSO accuracy results. Overall Sensitivity % Sensitivity Stage I/II, % Sensitivity Stage III/IV, % Primary or Secondary CSO Accuracy, % All Samples, 472 56% 31% 81% - Cancers included in CSO caller, 375 60% 35% 84% 92% Bladder, 13 62% 44% 100% 75% Breast, 86 45% 17% 88% 97% Colorectal, 41 83% 53% 100% 91% Esophageal-Stomach, 25 96% 100% 95% 96% Hepatocellular, 16 94% 100% 92% 67% Lung, 57 67% 41% 93% 97% Ovarian, 20 70% 80% 67% 100% Pancreas, 59 68% 50% 96% 93% Prostate, 59 21% 3% 41% 92% Cancers not included in CSO caller, 97 40% 18% 65% Endometrial, 29 38% 12% 75% Head & Neck, 15 80% 100% 63% Kidney, 44 34% 0% 71% Melanoma, 9 11% 0% 20%
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (10)
Yupeng He
Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA
Elmira Forouzmand
Guardant Health, San Diego, CA
Jordan Burke
Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA
Rachel Gittelman
Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA
Alan Selewa
Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA
Victoria M. Raymond
Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA
Sven Duenwald
Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA
Craig Eagle
Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA
AmirAli Talasaz
Guardant Health, Redwood City, CA
Darya Chudova
Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA