Evaluation of a 1021-gene NGS panel for HRD detection in clinical samples.

E Elena Fountzilas (St. Luke's Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece) E Eirini Papadopoulou V Vasiliki Metaxa-Mariatou S Stella Maxouri A Aikaterini Tsantikidi C Chrysiida Chatzigiannidou-Florou (GeneKor Medical S.A., Gerakas, Greece) K Konstantinos Papazisis (Geniki Kliniki Euromedica Thessaloniki, Pavlos Melas, Greece) C Christos A. Papadimitriou (Aretaieio University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece) T Theofanis Floros (Naval & Veterans Hospital of Athens/Hellenic Navy, Athina, Greece) M Michael Liontos (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Athens, Greece) A Alexandros Bokas ('Theagenio' Anticancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece) E Eleni Timotheadou (Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece) A Anastasios L. Boutis (Third Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenio Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece) P Prokopios Dimopoulos (Theagenio Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece) X Xiaorui Fu (1The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Department of Oncology, Zhengzhou, China) Y Yun Xing (MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental System Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering) X Xunmei Zheng (Geneplus-Beijing Institute, Beijing, China) X Xinhua Du (Geneplus-Beijing Institute, Beijing, China) G George Nasioulas

Abstract

e17569 Background: Molecular profiling of tumors using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) enables the detection of genetic alterations associated with response to targeted therapies, as well as the assessment of genomic scars indicative of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). HRD serves as a critical biomarker for predicting response to PARP inhibitors. In this study, the efficiency of a 1021-gene NGS panel was evaluated for HRD status analysis in comparison with validated methodologies in ovarian cancer tissues. Methods: A total of 43 tumor samples from 34 patients with known HRD status, based on validated Myriad and OncoScan methodologies, were analyzed. The NGS-based analysis (Gene+) included sequencing of 1021 genes and evaluation of genomic instability. Genomic instability was assessed using three key biological parameters: LOH (Loss of Heterozygosity), TAI (Telomeric Allelic Imbalance), and LST (Large-Scale Transitions). Key evaluation criteria included HRD score concordance, BRCA1/2 mutation detection, and methodology reproducibility. Results: HRD status showed a concordance rate of 97.1% (33/34) between the 1021+HRD panel and the validated Myriad test (Table 1). Discrepancies were observed in one sample, with an HRD score of 43 based on the 1021-gene panel, compared to 35 (Myriad), suggesting potential differences near the cutoff threshold. Sensitivity for BRCA1/2 mutation detection was 100%. Additionally, reproducibility of HRD detection was 100% across 12 repeated samples. Positive HRD scores remained consistent even at low TCC levels (≥20%), with an agreement rate of 95.7% (22/23). Conclusions: The new NGS methodology demonstrated high concordance with validated methodologies for HRD detection, robust BRCA mutation identification, and excellent reproducibility. These findings support its clinical utility for guiding therapeutic decisions with PARP inhibitors. Concordance between the validated NGS method and the 1021-gene pPanel. Validated HRD Test HRD + HRD - PPV NPV OPA r 1021+HRD HRD + 24 1 96.00% 100% 97.06% 0.9295 HRD - 0 9 p< .00001

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

E

Elena Fountzilas

St. Luke's Clinic, Thessaloniki, Greece

E

Eirini Papadopoulou

V

Vasiliki Metaxa-Mariatou

S

Stella Maxouri

A

Aikaterini Tsantikidi

C

Chrysiida Chatzigiannidou-Florou

GeneKor Medical S.A., Gerakas, Greece

K

Konstantinos Papazisis

Geniki Kliniki Euromedica Thessaloniki, Pavlos Melas, Greece

C

Christos A. Papadimitriou

Aretaieio University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

T

Theofanis Floros

Naval & Veterans Hospital of Athens/Hellenic Navy, Athina, Greece

M

Michael Liontos

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Athens, Greece

A

Alexandros Bokas

'Theagenio' Anticancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

E

Eleni Timotheadou

Papageorgiou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

A

Anastasios L. Boutis

Third Department of Clinical Oncology, Theagenio Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

P

Prokopios Dimopoulos

Theagenio Cancer Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

X

Xiaorui Fu

1The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Department of Oncology, Zhengzhou, China

Y

Yun Xing

MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental System Optimization, College of Environmental Science and Engineering

X

Xunmei Zheng

Geneplus-Beijing Institute, Beijing, China

X

Xinhua Du

Geneplus-Beijing Institute, Beijing, China

G

George Nasioulas