Evaluating the survival benefits of adjuvant immunotherapy in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma: A real-world experience.

M Mazyar Zahir C Chirag Doshi (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) D Domenique Escobar (University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA) L Leilei Xia (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) G Gus Miranda (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA) J Jie Cai (National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of MPTES in High Energy and Safety LIBs, Engineering Research Center of MTEES (Ministry of Education), Research Center of BMET (Guangdong Province), and Key Lab. of ETESPG(GHEI), School of Chemistry) A Anne K. Schuckman (University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA) H Hooman Djaladat (Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Laton, CA) S Siamak Daneshmand (Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center)

Abstract

750 Background: Despite current guidelines recommendations to administer adjuvant nivolumab following radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with adverse pathologies, regardless of prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), evidence on the long-term efficacy of ICIs remains sparse. This study aims to evaluate the potential survival benefits of the two most common ICIs, Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab, in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) at a single institution. Methods: We queried our IRB-approved, prospectively maintained institutional RC database for all patients who underwent RC from January 2017 (following FDA approval for ICIs in MIBC) to July 2022. Patients with pT3-4a and/or N+ after RC, or ypT2-4a and/or N+ after NAC + RC, were included and categorized into two groups: those who received adjuvant ICI (ICI+) and those who did not (ICI-). Demographic, clinical, and survival data were retrieved from our database. Multivariable Cox regressions were performed to adjust for potential confounding variables. Results: A total of 191 patients were included, with 38 (19.9%) receiving adjuvant ICI (30 Nivolumab and 8 Pembrolizumab). The table outlines the patient characteristics, stratified by adjuvant ICI treatment. With a median follow up of 17.9 months, overall survival (OS) was 97.4% in the ICI+ group and 66.0% in the ICI- group (p = .003). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 84.2% and 67.9% in the ICI+ and ICI- groups, respectively (p=.206). in the ICI- group, 10 out of 49 (20.4%) recurrences were local or regional (i.e. urethral or ureteral), while all recurrences (N=6) in the ICI+ group were distant. Multivariable Cox regressions demonstrated that, after adjusting for age and pathological stage, adjuvant ICI was associated with significantly improved OS (HR = 0.08 [95%CI: 0.01, 0.59], p = .013), but not RFS (HR = 0.43 [95%CI: 0.18, 1.04], p = .062). Conclusions: Our results corroborated the beneficial effect of ICIs on OS. Although the improvement in RFS did not reach statistical significance, ICIs showed a trend toward positive clinical impact. A notable finding was the potential for ICIs to alter the recurrence pattern in MIBC. Although limited by a small sample size, this study represents one of the first real-world evaluations of adjuvant ICI efficacy in a single-institution cohort. Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics. ICI+ (N=38) ICI- (N=153) p Age (years) 68.7 ± 8.6 71.6 ± 10.4 .060 Sex (Male) 27 (71.1%) 118 (77.1%) .433 Charleson Comorbidity Index 0 9 (23.7%) 31 (20.3%) .886 1 6 (15.8%) 27 (17.6%) ≥ 2 23 (60.5%) 95 (62.1%) Pathological staging OC (< (y)pT2; pN0) 3 (7.9%) 29 (19.0%) .013 EV (> (y)pT2; pN0) 11 (28.9%) 67 (43.8%) LN+ (pN+) 24 (63.2%) 57 (37.2%) Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (yes) 30 (79.0%) 85 (55.6%) .008

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 5_suppl
Published February 10, 2025
Pages 750-750
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

M

Mazyar Zahir

C

Chirag Doshi

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

D

Domenique Escobar

University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA

L

Leilei Xia

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

G

Gus Miranda

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

J

Jie Cai

National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of MPTES in High Energy and Safety LIBs, Engineering Research Center of MTEES (Ministry of Education), Research Center of BMET (Guangdong Province), and Key Lab. of ETESPG(GHEI), School of Chemistry

A

Anne K. Schuckman

University of Southern California Institute of Urology Los Angeles California USA

H

Hooman Djaladat

Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Laton, CA

S

Siamak Daneshmand

Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center