Evaluating the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A comprehensive Bayesian network meta-analysis.

U Umme Kulsum I Ibrahim Khalil (Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) M M. Rafiqul Islam (Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) I Irfat Islam Eva (Comilla Medical College and Hospital, Comilla, Bangladesh) S Shaila Saaki (Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) A Arindam Das Joy (Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) S Sunjida Amin Promi (Chittagong Medical College, Chittagong, Bangladesh) M Md. Imran Hossain M Md Abu Sayed (Chattogram medical college, Chattogam, Bangladesh) D Durjoy Acharjee (Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) D Dipta Aakash Biswas (Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) S Salsabil Tarannum Tarannum (Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) M Manisha Das (Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) M M.D. Ahsan Habib (Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh) S Sajjad Ghanim Al-Badri (College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq)

Abstract

e16475 Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, primarily driven by KIT or PDGFRA mutations. Imatinib has transformed GIST treatment; however, resistance typically emerges within 20–24 months, necessitating effective second-line therapies such as sunitinib, regorafenib, ripretinib, and masitinib. Methods: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of 17 studies including 2,422 patients evaluated the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and other targeted therapies for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) in imatinib-resistant GIST. Mean differences (MDs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were calculated, and treatments were ranked using Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curve (SUCRA) values. Control was used as the reference in all comparisons. Results: For PFS, masitinib showed the most significant improvement (MD: 11.78 months, 95% CrI: 0.29–23.49; SUCRA: 86.52%), followed by regorafenib (MD: 9.33 months, 95% CrI: 4.15–14.88; SUCRA: 79.7%) and sunitinib (MD: 8.68 months, 95% CrI: 3.47–14.13; SUCRA: 74.71%). In OS, masitinib ranked highest (MD: 34.09 months, 95% CrI: -20.64 to 90.13; SUCRA: 83.56%), followed by regorafenib (MD: 27.35 months, 95% CrI: -35.13 to 90.22; SUCRA: 76.96%) and sunitinib (MD: 17.16 months, 95% CrI: -9.66 to 44.89; SUCRA: 69.96%). Regorafenib led in ORR (RR: 8.23, 95% CrI: 0.68–97.04; SUCRA: 76.36%), followed by ripretinib (RR: 5.53, 95% CrI: 0.42–104.01; SUCRA: 63.91%) and sunitinib (RR: 4.56, 95% CrI: 0.66–40.67; SUCRA: 58.12%). Conclusions: Masitinib and regorafenib demonstrate the most promising efficacy for improving survival and treatment response in imatinib-resistant GIST patients. These findings emphasize the importance of tailored therapeutic strategies for advanced GIST management. Outcome Treatment Mean Difference / Relative Risk (95% CrI) SUCRA (%) Progression-Free Survival (PFS) (Months) Control Reference 26.00 Masitinib 11.78 (0.29 to 23.49) 86.52 Regorafenib 9.33 (4.15 to 14.88) 79.70 Sunitinib 8.68 (3.47 to 14.13) 74.71 Ripretinib 7.72 (0.04 to 15.50) 68.65 Sorafenib 3.10 (-8.19 to 13.73) 44.13 Pimitespib 2.33 (-7.75 to 12.46) 40.13 Overall Survival (OS) (Months) Control Reference 38.51 Masitinib 34.09 (-20.64 to 90.13) 83.56 Regorafenib 27.35 (-35.13 to 90.22) 76.96 Sunitinib 17.16 (-9.66 to 44.89) 69.96 Ripretinib 6.65 (-35.54 to 49.47) 50.83 Objective Response Rate (Relative Risk) Control Reference 15.94 Regorafenib 8.23 (0.68 to 97.04) 76.36 Ripretinib 5.53 (0.42 to 104.01) 63.91 Sunitinib 4.56 (0.66 to 40.67) 58.12 Sorafenib 4.95 (0.07 to 311.89) 57.53

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (15)

U

Umme Kulsum

I

Ibrahim Khalil

Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

M

M. Rafiqul Islam

Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

I

Irfat Islam Eva

Comilla Medical College and Hospital, Comilla, Bangladesh

S

Shaila Saaki

Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

A

Arindam Das Joy

Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

S

Sunjida Amin Promi

Chittagong Medical College, Chittagong, Bangladesh

M

Md. Imran Hossain

M

Md Abu Sayed

Chattogram medical college, Chattogam, Bangladesh

D

Durjoy Acharjee

Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

D

Dipta Aakash Biswas

Dhaka Medical College & Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

S

Salsabil Tarannum Tarannum

Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

M

Manisha Das

Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

M

M.D. Ahsan Habib

Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh

S

Sajjad Ghanim Al-Badri

College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq