Evaluating the clinical significance of tumor-expressed C-reactive protein in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

M Marie Mikuteit S Stefanie Zschäbitz (Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, and Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany) M Michael Autenrieth W Wilko Weichert A Arndt Hartmann (Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen) S Sandra Steffens F Franziska Erlmeier

Abstract

Abstract C-reactive Protein (CRP) has been established as a prognostic biomarker in various malignancies, with elevated serum levels correlating with poorer outcomes. However, the significance of tissue-based CRP expression specifically in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), remains inadequately characterized. This study investigates the potential prognostic relevance of intratumoral CRP expression from a substantial cohort of chRCC patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent surgical intervention for chRCC. Comprehensive clinical data was collected, and immunohistochemical evaluation of tumor specimens was performed to assess intratumoral CRP expression patterns. The study included 81 chRCC patients, with intratumoral CRP expression identified in 35 cases (43.2%). Statistical analysis revealed no significant correlation between CRP expression status and clinical parameters. While 5-year overall survival (OS) analysis showed no statistically significant difference between CRP-positive versus CRP-negative tumors (86.4% versus 100.0%; p  = 0.106), overall follow-up demonstrated a significantly higher mortality rate in patients with CRP-positive tumors compared to those with CRP-negative tumors (22.9% vs. 2.2%; p  = 0.013). Our findings suggest that intratumoral CRP expression in chRCC is not clearly associated with parameters of aggressiveness or survival. Further studies should assess the possible correlation between CRP tissue expression and blood levels. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the limited sample size, low event rate, and high loss to follow-up, and are best considered hypothesis-generating.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 16, Issue 1
Published July 14, 2026
ISSN 2045-2322
Publisher Nature Portfolio

Journal Info

Scientific Reports

Nature Portfolio

ISSN: 2045-2322 Open Access Life Sciences

Authors (7)

M

Marie Mikuteit

S

Stefanie Zschäbitz

Department of Medical Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, and Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany

M

Michael Autenrieth

W

Wilko Weichert

A

Arndt Hartmann

Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen

S

Sandra Steffens

F

Franziska Erlmeier