Evaluating physiological responses and forward head-neck posture in primary students in Thailand when carrying modified and traditional backpacks
Abstract
Carrying backpacks daily imposes a physical burden on school-aged children, raising increasing public concern. This study compared the physiological responses and head–neck posture of primary school students when carrying traditional versus modified bags. Thirty-two public primary school students aged 7–12 years participated. Physiological measures included heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO₂), blood pressure, and respiratory rate (RR). Head and neck tilt angles and forward head posture were assessed using photogrammetry and Kinovea software. Participants walked at a natural pace (1.1–1.3 m/s) along an 8-meter walkway for five minutes under five conditions: no bag, bilateral traditional bag, unilateral traditional bag, bilateral modified bag, and unilateral modified bag. Backpack design showed significant main effects on heart rate ( p = 0.001, ηp² = 0.316), respiratory rate ( p = 0.007, ηp² = 0.214), systolic blood pressure ( p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.387), and diastolic blood pressure ( p = 0.002, ηp² = 0.279), with higher values in the traditional condition (e.g., HR 95.94 ± 2.26 bpm; RR 31.59 ± 0.86 breaths/min; systolic 108.33 ± 1.30 mmHg; diastolic 78.05 ± 1.64 mmHg). Carrying method affected HR ( p = 0.014, ηp² = 0.178), with higher values during unilateral use. No interaction effects were found for physiological variables ( p > 0.05). SpO₂ remained stable (98.78–99.47%). For posture, significant effects of design were observed for neck tilt ( p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.350), head tilt ( p = 0.001, ηp² = 0.324), and forward head posture ( p < 0.001, ηp² = 0.335). The traditional backpack produced smaller neck tilt (49.75° ± 1.05°) but greater head tilt (78.60° ± 1.56°) and forward head posture (8.68 ± 4.59 cm). Unilateral carrying increased head tilt (77.83° ± 1.56°, p = 0.021). Interaction effects were found for neck and head tilt ( p < 0.05). The modified backpack reduces physiological strain and improves postural alignment, particularly under unilateral carrying, while bilateral use minimizes asymmetrical loading.
Article Details
Authors (4)
Jittaporn Mongkonkansai
Udomsak Narkkul
Chadapa Rungruangbaiyok
Chuchard Punsawad