Epcoritamab with lenalidomide and tafasitamab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (ECLAT), a phase 2 investigator-initiated trial

P Pallawi Torka (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) O Olivia Kelly (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) H Holly Levenstein (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) M Monifa Douglas (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) H Helen Jacob (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) R Regina Truong (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) E Eleanor Eley (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) S Susana Moscoso (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) A Alexander Boardman (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) P Philip Caron (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) K Kevin David (1Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine, Lymphoma Service, NEW YORK, United States) Z Zachary Epstein-Peterson (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) L Lorenzo Falchi (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York) P Paola Ghione (4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) S Steven Horwitz (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) J Jasmine Zain (1Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine, Lymphoma Service, NEW YORK, United States) A Andrew Zelenetz (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) A Andrew Intlekofer (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) W William Johnson (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) A Anita Kumar (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) J Jennifer Lue (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) E Efrat Luttwak (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) A Alison Moskowitz (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) A Ariela Noy (2Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY) C Colette Owens (1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) L Lia Palomba (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States) R Raphael Steiner R Robert Stuver (3Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) S Santosha Vardhana (1Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States) G Gilles Salles (41Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) P Paul Hamlin (1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States)

Abstract

Abstract Background Patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) DLBCL ineligible for chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and/or autologous stem cell transplant (CART/ ASCT) or with progressive disease after CART/ASCT represent a major unmet need. 3rd line and beyond (3L+) therapy for DLBCL is individualized and despite availability of several approved options, sustained remissions are obtained only in a minority of patients. Tafasitamab was FDA approved in combination with lenalidomide (tafa-len) in 2020 for 2L+ DLBCL based on the L-MIND study which showed an overall response rate (ORR) or 57.5%, complete response rate (CRR) of 40% and duration of response (DOR) of 42.9 months (mo). Epcoritamab (epco) was approved by FDA for 3L+ DLBCL in 2024 based on EPCORE-NHL1 study which showed an ORR of 61%, CRR of 38% and DOR of 15.6 months.Recent data shows that efficacy of these agents in real-world is much lower with a CRR of 12-19% for tafa-len and 23-33% for epco. Other than hematologic toxicity, these drugs do not have any overlapping toxicities and hence lend themselves to rational combinations. In fact, len can stimulate T-cell mediated killing of neoplastic cells via enhanced formation of effective immunological synapses and there is emerging data that len can enhance efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells as well as bi-specific T-cell engagers. The combination of epco and len was studied in EPCORE NHL-5 and demonstrated a higher ORR of 72% and CMR rate of 53% than single agent epco. This improvement in efficacy came at the cost of slightly increased incidence of CRS and neutropenia. Preclinical studies have also shown that the combination of tafa and a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging antibody significantly increases tumor cell eradication both in vitro and in vivo. We hypothesize that the combination of epcoritamab with tafasitamab and lenalidomide (epco-tafa-len) will be well tolerated and effective in patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) DLBCL. Methods Study design: The ECLAT study is a phase 2, open label, single arm, single institution study of epco-tafa-len for a fixed duration of therapy of 12 cycles with each treatment cycle of 28-day duration (NCT07030699). Eligibility: Patients with R/R DLBCL are eligible if they have received at least 2 prior lines of therapy including CART or ASCT or if they have received at least one prior line of therapy and are ineligible or unable to undergo CART/ASCT due to logistical or other barriers. Prior treatment with bispecific antibodies in 1L or as bridging in 2L is permissible. Presence of CD20 and CD19 is required on most recent representative biopsy. Treatment: Patients will receive epco weekly for 12 weeks followed by once every 28 days based on the EPCORE NHL-5 study. Tafa will be given weekly for 12 weeks followed by every other week for cycles 4-12 per FDA label. Len will be given orally on days 1-21 of each cycle. We plan to start len at a lower dose of 20 mg a priori to reduce risk of hematologic toxicities in this heavily pretreated population. We also plan to allow for pragmatic dose adjustment of len based on renal function to encourage enrollment for older adults who are typically excluded due to low creatinine clearance as a function of their age when estimated by the Cockcroft Gault formula. Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate efficacy (best CRR) of epco-tafa-len in patients with RR DLBCL. Secondary objectives include evaluation of other measures of efficacy [best ORR, progression-free survival (PFS), DOR, duration of complete response (DOCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS)] and to characterize the adverse event profile of the combination. Exploratory objectives include evaluation of additional measures of efficacy such as CRR and ORR at the end of therapy, 1-year PFS and OS and 2-year PFS and OS, characterization of response based on cell of origin and DLBCL subtypes by gene expression profiling (GEP), and to understand the ctDNA response kinetics of the combination. Statistics: A total of 27 patients are planned to be enrolled with a built-in safety run in of first 6 patients. The primary endpoint in best complete response rate per 2014 Lugano response criteria. Considering a null hypothesis of 35% and an alternate hypothesis (promising rate) of 60% CRR, a total of 27 patients will be needed for an alpha error of 0.05 and power of 80%. The study is open and currently recruiting patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 1971-1971
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (31)

P

Pallawi Torka

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

O

Olivia Kelly

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

H

Holly Levenstein

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

M

Monifa Douglas

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

H

Helen Jacob

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

R

Regina Truong

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

E

Eleanor Eley

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

S

Susana Moscoso

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

A

Alexander Boardman

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

P

Philip Caron

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

K

Kevin David

1Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine, Lymphoma Service, NEW YORK, United States

Z

Zachary Epstein-Peterson

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

L

Lorenzo Falchi

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

P

Paola Ghione

4Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

S

Steven Horwitz

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

J

Jasmine Zain

1Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Medicine, Lymphoma Service, NEW YORK, United States

A

Andrew Zelenetz

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

A

Andrew Intlekofer

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

W

William Johnson

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

A

Anita Kumar

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

J

Jennifer Lue

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

E

Efrat Luttwak

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

A

Alison Moskowitz

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

A

Ariela Noy

2Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

C

Colette Owens

1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

L

Lia Palomba

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States

R

Raphael Steiner

R

Robert Stuver

3Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

S

Santosha Vardhana

1Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States

G

Gilles Salles

41Lymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

P

Paul Hamlin

1memorial Sloan Kettering, NYC, United States