Epcoritamab monotherapy demonstrates promising efficacy in patients with Richter transformation (RT): 2-year follow-up results from arm 2A of the phase 1b/2 EPCORE CLL-1 trial
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: RT is a rare, often fatal, transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) into an aggressive lymphoma, mostly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). RT occurs in ~2%–10% of patients. Outcomes are particularly poor in patients previously treated for CLL, with median OS as short as 1 year compared with 5 years in treatment-naive cases (Kittai AS, et al. Blood Cancer J 2025;15:23). There is no established standard of care for RT, highlighting a critical unmet need for more effective therapies. Epcoritamab is a subcutaneous CD3×CD20 bispecific antibody approved for relapsed or refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma and DLBCL after ≥2 lines of therapy (LOT). The ongoing EPCORE® CLL-1 trial (NCT04623541) evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of epcoritamab in both R/R CLL and RT. Here, we report 2-year follow-up efficacy and safety results of epcoritamab monotherapy in RT from arm 2A. Methods: Adults with biopsy-proven transformation to CD20+ DLBCL, a history of CLL or small lymphocytic lymphoma, who were ineligible for or declined chemoimmunotherapy, and had received ≤2 prior LOTs for RT, received epcoritamab 48 mg in 28-day cycles (C; QW, C1–3; Q2W, C4–9; Q4W, C≥10) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Step-up dosing and corticosteroid prophylaxis were used in C1 to minimize cytokine release syndrome (CRS). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by PET-CT (Lugano criteria). Additional endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, PFS, OS, duration of response (DOR), and safety. Results: As of March 21, 2025, 42 patients with RT received epcoritamab monotherapy, including 21 as first-line (1L) RT-directed therapy. Median age was 69 years (range, 50–80); 48% had TP53 mutation/del(17p), 55% had Ann Arbor stage IV disease, and 76% had received prior CLL-directed therapy, including modern targeted therapies in over half of patients. With a median follow-up of 22.9 months (range, 0.5+ to 39.9), ORR was 48% (95% CI, 32−64) and CR rate was 40% (17/42) in the total study population (N=42). Median DOR was 9.8 months (95% CI, 5.6 to not reached [NR]) with a median duration of CR (DOCR) of 10.0 months (95% CI, 7.6−NR). Overall, median PFS was 3.0 months (95% CI, 1.6−9.9) and median OS was 13.0 months (95% CI, 6.6−NR). When stratified by number of prior RT-directed LOTs, notable differences in clinical outcomes were observed. In patients receiving epcoritamab as 1L RT therapy (n=21), ORR was 57% (95% CI, 34–78), with 52% (11/21) achieving CR. Responses were durable; median DOR and DOCR were both NR (95% CI, 6.2−NR). At 24 months, ~52% of responders and ~56% of complete responders remained in response. Median PFS and OS were 8.5 months (95% CI, 1.5−NR) and 27.5 months (95% CI, 9.1−NR), respectively, in patients treated with epcoritamab for 1L RT. In contrast, among patients treated with epcoritamab in second- or later-line (2L+) settings (n=21), ORR was 38% (95% CI, 18−62) and CR rate was 29% (6/21). In this group, median DOR was 6.6 months (95% CI, 1.3−NR), median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.4−5.6), and median OS was 9.8 months (95% CI, 3.1−16.0). Safety was consistent with prior epcoritamab experience (Kater AP, et al. HemaSphere 2024;8[Suppl 1]:S163). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were CRS (86%), infection (74%), anemia (50%), thrombocytopenia (48%), neutropenia (45%), diarrhea (36%), and fatigue (31%). Most CRS events occurred after the first full dose, were low grade (grade 1/2, 79%; grade 3, 7%) and resolved within a median of 3 days in 97% of patients. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 12% of patients (all grade 1/2), and clinical tumor lysis syndrome in 5%. Four patients (10%) discontinued treatment due to a TEAE, and 3 (7%) experienced fatal events, none considered related to study treatment. Conclusions: Epcoritamab monotherapy induced high response rates with prolonged survival in patients with RT. Outcomes were more favorable when epcoritamab was given as 1L RT-directed therapy, with over half of patients achieving a CR and a median OS exceeding 2 years. Epcoritamab demonstrated a manageable safety profile that was consistent with that described for other disease states. These results highlight the potential of epcoritamab as a core therapy in RT and support its ongoing evaluation in the EPCORE CLL-1 trial, including in combination regimens.
Article Details
Authors (17)
Arnon Kater
Ann Janssens
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Herbert Eradat
27Department of Hematology and Oncology, Santa Monica Cancer Care, Santa Monica, CA
Fritz Offner
Jose D. Sandoval-Sus
3Moffitt Cancer Center at Memorial Healthcare System, Pembroke Pines, United States
Mazyar Shadman
Christian Poulsen
17Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
Jacob Christensen
Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark
Meghan Thompson
1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
Meijian Guan
Andrew J. Steele
14Genmab, Plainsboro, NJ
Marcia Rios
10Genmab, Plainsboro, United States
Marie Holst Mørch
15Genmab, Copenhagen, Denmark
Toshihiko Oki
13AbbVie, North Chicago, United States
Rebecca Valentin
15Genmab, Copenhagen, Denmark
Mar Bellido
13University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Barbara Eichhorst
Department I of Internal Medicine, Center of Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany