Enhancing the sequential flamsa-treosulfan conditioning regimen with venetoclax – first results from the multicenter flamsaclax Phase I/II trial

F Felicitas Schulz U Udo Holtick (2University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany) M Mareike Verbeek (3Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany) E Edgar Jost G Gesine Bug (13Department of Medicine 2, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany) I Inken Hilgendorf (6University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany) N Nadja Drusenheimer (1University Hospital Düsseldorf, Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Düsseldorf, Germany) C Christof Scheid (12Hospital Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, Clinic for Oncology and Hematology, Regensburg, Germany) P Peter Herhaus (4Clinic and Policlinic for Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany) K Kathrin Nachtkamp P Paul Jäger N Norbert Gattermann S Sascha Dietrich U Ulrich Germing G Guido Kobbe

Abstract

Abstract Background: Sequential conditioning regimens are widely used to prepare patients with high-risk myeloid malignancies for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT). Venetoclax has been shown to act synergistically with hypomethylating agents (HMA) and conventional chemotherapy. Therefore, we initiated a Phase I/II trial to combine Venetoclax with the so-called FLAMSA-Treosulfan Regimen. Methods: Patients with high-risk MDS, CMML or low blast count AML were eligible if they were untreated or had received a maximum of 2 cycles HMA +/- Venetoclax. Using a classical 3+3 design, patients received escalating doses of Venetoclax starting on day -11, one day before a 4-day treatment with FLAMSA (day -10 to -7, Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day, Amsacrine 100 mg/m2/day and Cytarabine 2 g/m2/day, 1 g/m2/day for patients older than 60 years). Venetoclax was given daily until the day after FLAMSA (day -6) followed by high-dose Treosulfan (3x 10 g/m2/day, day -5 to -3). Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells were infused on day 0 and GvHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and a total dose of 30 mg/kg ATG. Results: A total of 9 patients (3 female) at a median age of 62 years (range 56 - 69) were included in the phase I part of the study (6 MDS, 2 CMML, 1 AML, all having active disease and unfavorable biology). Three patients received a total daily dose of 200 mg, 3 of 400 mg, 2 of 800 mg and 1 of 1600 mg Venetoclax in combination with FLAMSA. Following the infusion of a median of 7.2 x 106 CD34+ cells (range 4.1 - 9.7 x 106) from matched (10/10) unrelated donors and G-CSF support, all patients engrafted. Neutrophil (> 500 per microliter) and platelet recovery (> 20,000 per microliter) was achieved in all patients after a median of 14 days (range 10 - 27) and 16 days (range 10 - 27), respectively. No dose limiting toxicity occurred. Adverse events included grade 3 to 4 hematotoxicity as well as gastrointestinal disorders, febrile neutropenia, infections and electrolyte imbalances typical for the early phase after alloHSCT. There was no VOD and no specific unexpected toxicity attributable to Venetoclax identified. No patient died. Best response during the first 3 months after alloHSCT was CR in all patients, 4 with incomplete donor chimerism. Acute GvHD was diagnosed in 8 patients (3x I°, 4x II°, 1x III°). Three patients relapsed and received salvage therapy resulting in CR in 2 patients so far. After a median follow up of 365 days (range 74 - 640), all patients are alive, 8 of 9 in CR. Three patients are affected by chronic GvHD — one each with mild, moderate, and severe manifestations. Conclusion: Smart conditioning using Venetoclax up to a daily dose of 800 mg in addition to FLAMSA-Treosulfan is safe. Hematopoietic reconstitution was not impaired and general toxicity of this sequential conditioning regimen was not increased. Early results are promising and the Phase II part of the FLAMSAClax study will continue to include patients up to a total number of 38.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5992-5992
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (15)

F

Felicitas Schulz

U

Udo Holtick

2University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

M

Mareike Verbeek

3Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

E

Edgar Jost

G

Gesine Bug

13Department of Medicine 2, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

I

Inken Hilgendorf

6University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany

N

Nadja Drusenheimer

1University Hospital Düsseldorf, Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, Düsseldorf, Germany

C

Christof Scheid

12Hospital Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, Clinic for Oncology and Hematology, Regensburg, Germany

P

Peter Herhaus

4Clinic and Policlinic for Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany

K

Kathrin Nachtkamp

P

Paul Jäger

N

Norbert Gattermann

S

Sascha Dietrich

U

Ulrich Germing

G

Guido Kobbe