Engineering Layered Nanomaterials for Cancer Theranostics: Current Progress and Future Opportunities

X Xiangrong Pan (College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Henan Key Laboratory of Function‐Oriented Porous Materials Luoyang Normal University Luoyang P. R. China) T Tingting Hu Y Yajie Zhang (Center for Carbon-Based Electronics and Key Laboratory for the Physics and Chemistry of Nanodevices, School of Electronics) X Xiaoyan Lu (College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Key Laboratory of Function-Oriented Porous Materials) H Huizhi Chen (Dongguan Key Laboratory of Advanced Drug Delivery and Biosensing Research and Development School of Pharmacy and Dongguan Innovation Institute Guangdong Medical University Dongguan P. R. China) Y Yubin Zhou L Lufang Ma (College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Henan Key Laboratory of Function‐Oriented Porous Materials Luoyang Normal University Luoyang P. R. China) Z Zhan Zhou R Ruizheng Liang (State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering Beijing University of Chemical Technology Beijing P. R. China) C Chaoliang Tan

Abstract

ABSTRACT Atomic‐level structural engineering represents a powerful paradigm for tailoring layered nanomaterials (LNs) toward advanced cancer theranostics, enabling precise control of physicochemical properties to overcome the limitations of conventional nanoplatforms. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the latest advances in engineering LNs, including layered metal oxides, layered double hydroxides, transition metal dichalcogenides, graphene, layered silicates, graphitic carbon nitride, metal carbides and nitrides, and other layered frameworks for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Five representative atomic‐level engineering strategies are discussed, including crystal phase engineering, defect engineering, heteroatom doping, interlayer spacing engineering, and crystalline‐to‐amorphous phase engineering. For each strategy, the underlying mechanisms, representative synthetic approaches, and their roles in optimizing theranostic performance, such as photothermal conversion, reactive oxygen species generation, and multimodal imaging, are critically discussed. Crucially, the advantages and inherent limitations of these engineering strategies are comparatively evaluated to provide a balanced perspective on their practical applicability. Finally, key challenges toward clinical translation, including structural stability, biosafety, and scalability, are highlighted. Future directions are proposed for developing intelligent, adaptive, and personalized LN‐based nanomedicines for precision oncology.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 65, Issue 27
Published July 01, 2026
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (10)

X

Xiangrong Pan

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Henan Key Laboratory of Function‐Oriented Porous Materials Luoyang Normal University Luoyang P. R. China

T

Tingting Hu

Y

Yajie Zhang

Center for Carbon-Based Electronics and Key Laboratory for the Physics and Chemistry of Nanodevices, School of Electronics

X

Xiaoyan Lu

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Key Laboratory of Function-Oriented Porous Materials

H

Huizhi Chen

Dongguan Key Laboratory of Advanced Drug Delivery and Biosensing Research and Development School of Pharmacy and Dongguan Innovation Institute Guangdong Medical University Dongguan P. R. China

Y

Yubin Zhou

L

Lufang Ma

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Henan Key Laboratory of Function‐Oriented Porous Materials Luoyang Normal University Luoyang P. R. China

Z

Zhan Zhou

R

Ruizheng Liang

State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering Beijing University of Chemical Technology Beijing P. R. China

C

Chaoliang Tan