EMBARK: Testosterone recovery to >250 ng/dL following treatment suspension.

S Stephen J. Freedland (Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars–Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles) R Ronald Tutrone (United Urology Group, Towson, MD) F Fred Saad (Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal) M Michael Cookson (University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK) D Daniel R. Saltzstein (Urology San Antonio, San Antonio, TX) S Stephanie Chan (Pfizer Inc., South San Francisco, CA) F Fong Wang (Pfizer, South San Francisco, CA) M Matt Rosales (Oncology Global Development, Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL) R Ruslan Croitoru (Astellas Pharma Inc., Northbrook, IL) N Neal D. Shore (START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC)

Abstract

5088 Background: The phase 3 EMBARK trial demonstrated significantly longer metastasis-free survival and overall survival for enzalutamide plus leuprolide (enzalutamide combination) vs leuprolide alone in patients with prostate cancer and high-risk biochemical recurrence (hrBCR). In EMBARK, patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 0.2 ng/mL at week 36 suspended treatment at week 37. Androgen deprivation-related testosterone suppression has been linked to adverse health outcomes, whereas testosterone recovery while off treatment has been associated with improved quality of life. The objective of this post hoc analysis was to assess testosterone recovery to > 250 ng/dL during treatment suspension in patients treated with enzalutamide combination. Methods: Eligible patients had hrBCR, with a PSA doubling time of ≤9 months. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to enzalutamide + leuprolide, leuprolide alone, or enzalutamide monotherapy. Patients who suspended treatment at week 37 reinitiated treatment upon PSA increase to protocol-defined levels. Testosterone levels were assessed every 12 weeks. Results: In the enzalutamide combination group, 320 patients suspended treatment. During treatment suspension, testosterone recovery to > 250 ng/dL occurred in 108 patients (33.8%) (Table). Among those who recovered their testosterone, median and mean time to recovery was 5.6 months and 6.8 months, respectively, although some patients had delayed recovery (Table). Conclusions: Testosterone recovery to > 250 ng/dL during treatment suspension was observed in approximately one-third of patients treated with enzalutamide combination. While average time to testosterone recovery among those who recovered was ~6 months, recovery was delayed in some patients. Disclosure: Pfizer’s generative AI tool MAIA was used in developing this abstract; the authors reviewed, edited, and take full responsibility for the content. Clinical trial information: NCT02319837 . Enza combination(N=320) Patients who reached testosterone recovery, n (%) 108 (33.8) Time to testosterone recovery >250 ng/dL, months † Median (range) 5.6 (0.0–22.1) Mean (SD) 6.8 (2.87) The data cutoff date was January 31, 2023. † Time to testosterone recovery during treatment suspension is based on the number of patients who reached testosterone recovery, and was defined as the time from the date of the start of treatment suspension to the date of the first occurrence of testosterone >250 ng/dL. The summary is based on testosterone records during treatment suspension from patients who had treatment suspension and non-missing testosterone records after treatment suspension. For patients who reinitiated treatment, testosterone records after reinitiation were not considered.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 5088-5088
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (10)

S

Stephen J. Freedland

Department of Urology, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars–Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles

R

Ronald Tutrone

United Urology Group, Towson, MD

F

Fred Saad

Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal

M

Michael Cookson

University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, OK

D

Daniel R. Saltzstein

Urology San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

S

Stephanie Chan

Pfizer Inc., South San Francisco, CA

F

Fong Wang

Pfizer, South San Francisco, CA

M

Matt Rosales

Oncology Global Development, Astellas Pharma, Northbrook, IL

R

Ruslan Croitoru

Astellas Pharma Inc., Northbrook, IL

N

Neal D. Shore

START Carolinas/Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC