Eliminating air pollution disparities requires more than emission reduction
Abstract
In the United States, people of color are disproportionately and unjustly exposed to air pollution. Historically, environmental policy has emphasized aggregate emission reductions, yet major emission reduction scenarios do not sufficiently mitigate relative exposure disparities. Here, we show that without focusing on relative disparity (percent difference) in exposure, the only way to improve air quality and eliminate absolute exposure disparity is to eliminate all emissions (an unlikely outcome). We demonstrate that the relative disparity metric is ethically important and also a controllable societal feature that can reduce absolute disparity in exposure. We illustrate a range of approaches to air pollution policy that go beyond traditional emission reductions to meaningfully address exposure disparities. These strategies should be at the center of the future US environmental policy.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (9)
Libby H. Koolik
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California
Robert D. Bullard
Barbara Jordan-Mickey Leland School of Public Affairs, Texas Southern University
Esther Min
Front and Centered
Rachel Morello-Frosch
School of Public Health, University of California
Regan Patterson
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California
Manuel Salgado
WE-ACT for Environmental Justice
Nico Wedekind
Front and Centered
Julian D. Marshall
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington
Joshua S. Apte
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California