Elacestrant combinations in patients (pts) with ER+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC): Safety update from ELEVATE, a phase (Ph) 1b/2, open-label, umbrella study.

N Nancy Chan V Virginia G. Kaklamani (University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX) S Sara M. Tolaney (Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) E Erika P. Hamilton (Breast Cancer Research Program, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville) M Marina Nasrin Sharifi (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI) K Kristine Rinn (Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA) W Wassim Mchayleh (AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL) R Rinat Yerushalmi (Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tiqva, Israel) N Neelima Vidula (Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) J Joyce O'Shaughnessy (Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Dallas, TX) G Giuseppe Curigliano J Javier Cortés (International Breast Cancer Center, Pangaea Oncology, Quiron Group, Barcelona) P Paula Muñoz Romero (Menarini Group, Florence, Italy) D Denise M. Lepley (Menarini Group, New York, NY) K Kathy Puyana Theall (Menarini Group, New York, NY) T Tomer Wasserman (Menarini Group, New York, NY) H Hope S. Rugo (City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA)

Abstract

1079 Background: Tumors develop resistance following 1L endocrine therapy (ET) + CDK4/6i in ER+/HER2- mBC. Elacestrant (Ela) significantly improved PFS vs standard-of-care (SOC) ET ( ESR1 -mut tumors HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.39-0.77; P=0.0005; all pts HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55-0.88; P=0.0018) with a manageable safety profile for pts with ER+/HER2- mBC and prior ET+CDK4/6i (Bidard 2022). ELEVATE (NCT05563220) evaluates Ela in combination with everolimus (Eve), alpelisib (Alp), capivasertib (Capi), ribociclib (Ribo), palbociclib (Palbo), or abemaciclib (Abema) to address different resistance mechanisms. Prior analyses have demonstrated safety consistent with the known profiles of each agent in combination with SOC ET. Ph 1b safety and efficacy evaluations reported the RP2D and antitumor activity with the following combinations: Ela + Eve (RP2D: Ela 345 mg QD + Eve 7.5 mg QD) and Ela + Abema (RP2D: Ela 345 mg QD + Abema 150 mg BID)(Ciruelos ESMO 2024, Rugo ESMO 2024). Ela 345 mg + Palbo 125 mg was determined as the RP2D (Rugo SABCS 2024). Herein, we report updated safety that includes additional pts/dose levels, and longer observation time for Ela in different combinations. Methods: Eligible pts have ER+/HER2- mBC and 1-2L of prior ET regardless of ESR1 -mut status. Objectives are to determine the RP2D (Ph 1b) and evaluate PFS (Ph 2) with each combination. Results: Table 1 reports the most common all-grade AEs from Ph 1b (Ribo, Alp, Capi combinations) and Ph 1b + Ph 2 (Eve combination) as of Dec 2024. Ela 345 mg + Ribo 400 mg QD was identified as the RP2D. Updated data will be presented. Conclusions: Elacestrant combinations continue to demonstrate safety consistent with the known profiles of each drug + SOC ET without increased risk of associated AEs. Elacestrant has the potential to become an ET backbone for multiple targeted agents, providing an all-oral treatment option in pts with ER+/HER2- mBC, delaying chemo or ADC-based regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT05563220 . Treatment-emergent AEs (≥30%). Ph 1B Ph 1B + Ph 2 Ph 1B Ph 1B Ela (86-345 mg) + Ribo (400-600 mg) (n=32) Ela (258-345 mg) + Eve (5-10 mg) (n=72) Ela (258 mg) + Alp (150-250 mg) (n=11) Ela (258-345 mg) + Capi (320 mg) (n=9) All grades, n (%) Neutropenia* 12 (38) Nausea 10 (31) Nausea 39 (54) Diarrhea 31 (43) Stomatitis 27 (38) Fatigue 23 (32) Nausea 8 (73) Vomiting 6 (55) Rash † 4 (36) Nausea 6 (67) Fatigue 5 (56) Diarrhea 5 (56) Vomiting 3 (33) Grade ≥3, n (%) Neutropenia* 8 (25) Diarrhea 5 (7) Nausea 4 (6) Fatigue 4 (6) Stomatitis 2 (3) Rash † 2 (18) Nausea 1 (9) 0 *Combined terms; † Maculopapular rash.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 1079-1079
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

N

Nancy Chan

V

Virginia G. Kaklamani

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

S

Sara M. Tolaney

Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

E

Erika P. Hamilton

Breast Cancer Research Program, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville

M

Marina Nasrin Sharifi

University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI

K

Kristine Rinn

Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA

W

Wassim Mchayleh

AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL

R

Rinat Yerushalmi

Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tiqva, Israel

N

Neelima Vidula

Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

J

Joyce O'Shaughnessy

Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Dallas, TX

G

Giuseppe Curigliano

J

Javier Cortés

International Breast Cancer Center, Pangaea Oncology, Quiron Group, Barcelona

P

Paula Muñoz Romero

Menarini Group, Florence, Italy

D

Denise M. Lepley

Menarini Group, New York, NY

K

Kathy Puyana Theall

Menarini Group, New York, NY

T

Tomer Wasserman

Menarini Group, New York, NY

H

Hope S. Rugo

City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA