Efficacy of velzatinib (IDRX-42) in patients with advanced/metastatic GIST by line of therapy and circulating tumor DNA response in the phase 1/1b StrateGIST 1 trial.
Abstract
11520 Background: Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are driven by mutations in KIT or PDGFRA . Resistance to standard tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is largely driven by acquisition of secondary mutations in KIT exons 13/14/17/18. Velzatinib (subject to USAN approval) is a broad-spectrum TKI designed to inhibit most common primary KIT mutations (exons 9 and 11) as well as secondary mutations. We present updated circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) results from StrateGIST 1, a phase 1/1b study evaluating the efficacy and safety of velzatinib across primary and secondary mutations in patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic GIST. Methods: The study design of StrateGIST 1 has been previously described (Schöffski et al. J Clin Oncol 2024). Clinical activity was assessed by mRECIST v1.1. Blood samples for ctDNA analyses (Guardant360 assay) were collected for all pts before and serially during treatment. Data analysis was performed in R and hazard ratios were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: As of September 2025, 256 pts received velzatinib across all lines of therapy. Velzatinib showed clinical activity against both primary (Exon 9 ORR: 44% [95% CI: 29.1, 60.1]; Exon 11 ORR: 19% [95% CI: 12.7, 27.6]) and secondary (Exon 13 ORR: 17% [95% CI: 8.6, 27.9]; Exon 14 ORR: 20% [95% CI: 2.5, 55.6]; Exon 17 ORR: 23% [95% CI: 14.6, 33.2]) mutations. Clinical activity is supported by ctDNA analysis (n=180 pts); >99% reduction in ctDNA variant allele frequency (VAF) was observed across a broad spectrum of individual mutations (Exon 9: 80%; Exon 11: 67%; Exon 13: 80%; Exon 14: 80%; Exon 17: 83%). We also evaluated the predictive value of different exon mutations in KIT detected at baseline via ctDNA. Focusing on pts with primary mutations only, KIT exon 9 mutations had 3-fold lower risk of disease progression compared to exon 11 mutations (HR=3.06). No significant difference was observed between major secondary mutations (exon 13 vs exon 17). Additionally, 46 pts without detectable KIT/PDGFRA mutations at baseline showed a lower progression risk (HR=0.41) compared to 180 pts with detectable KIT/PDGFRA mutations, underscoring the prognostic and/or predictive value of ctDNA analysis, even in low-shedding indications such as GIST. Conclusions: Velzatinib has broad activity against clinically relevant KIT mutations in pts with advanced and/or metastatic GIST and can substantially reduce ctDNA levels across a broad spectrum of clinically meaningful KIT mutation profiles. Baseline exon-level KIT mutation status and ctDNA detectability provide potentially useful prognostic and predictive data, justifying further study to discern the relationship between clinical benefit and molecular response. This study (NCT05489237) is funded by GSK. Clinical trial information: NCT05489237 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Michael C. Heinrich
Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
Cesar Serrano
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
Suzanne George
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Neeltje Steeghs
Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Antoine Italiano
Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
Axel Le Cesne
Robin Lewis Jones
Royal Marsden Hospital, London, Chelsea, United Kingdom
Margaret von Mehren
Patrick Schöffski
From the Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center (J.D.W.) and the Department of Medicine (J.D.W., M.A.P.), Weill Cornell Medicine, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (M.A.P.) — both in New York; Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua (V.C.-S.), European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan (P.Q.), Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, IRCCS, Meldola (M.G.), University of Siena and the Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena (M.M.), and Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples (P.A.A.) — all in Italy; Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland (P.R.); Texas Oncology–Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Dallas (C.L.C.); University Hospital Essen, the German Cancer Consortium, the National Center for Tumor Diseases–West, the Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, and University Duisburg-Essen — all in Essen, Germany (D.S.); the College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea (J.W.), Brist...
Neeta Somaiah
Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jonathan C. Trent
University of Miami/Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL
Ciara M. Kelly
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Saori Mishima
George Demetri
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Eduardo Gomez Castaneda
GSK, Stevenage, United Kingdom
Anna-Christina Strobl
GSK, Stevenage, United Kingdom
Hank Schmidt
GSK, New York, NY
Sean O’Donnell
GSK, Collegeville, PA
Sebastian Bauer