Efficacy of upfront blinatumomab combined with reduced-intensity chemotherapy for newly diagnosed adult Philadelphia chromosome–negative B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Interim analysis of two prospective studies of JSCT ALL/MRD2023 and ALL/MRD2019 in Japan
Abstract
Abstract Background In adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome–negative B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph– B-ALL), treatment strategies must balance long-term survival with the mitigation of therapy-related toxicity. The introduction of the bispecific T-cell engager blinatumomab (Blina) has emerged as a promising approach, particularly for measurable residual disease (MRD)-positive patients. However, the optimal timing of Blina administration and its role in modulating chemotherapy intensity remain to be fully elucidated. We conducted a comparative analysis of two prospective clinical trials: ALL/MRD2019, which added Blina only for patients with post-intensive chemotherapy MRD positivity, and ALL/MRD2023, which implemented upfront Blina in all patients following early consolidation with reduced-intensity chemotherapy. Methods Both protocols consisted of induction therapy (Treatment A) followed by consolidation using cytarabine (Treatment B) and methotrexate (Treatment C). MRD was evaluated by allele-specific oligonucleotide quantitative PCR targeting rearranged TCR and IG genes. In the ALL/MRD2019 protocol, patients who were MRD-negative after Treatment C-1 received additional cycles of A, B, and C, followed by maintenance. MRD-positive patients received one additional A course, omitted additional B and C, and received 4 cycles of Blina. In the ALL/MRD2023 protocol, all patients received 4 cycles of Blina after Treatment C-1, regardless of MRD status. In both protocols, patients with MRD positivity after C-1 or with relapse during therapy were recommended for allogeneic stem cell transplantation if feasible; non-transplant candidates received 2 years of maintenance. ALL/MRD2023 omitted Treatment B-2 and C-2 (thus reducing chemotherapy intensity) but increased intrathecal prophylaxis from 7 to 12 doses. As both studies are ongoing, the primary endpoints of this interim analysis were 2-year overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS). Results As of June 2025, 137 patients had been enrolled in the ALL/MRD2023 study and 121 in the ALL/MRD2019 study (total 258 patients). The MRD negativity rate after induction (Treatment A-1) was 53.3% in ALL/MRD2023 vs 45.5% in ALL/MRD2019 (p=0.21). In the ALL/MRD2019 cohort, 26.4% were MRD-positive after Treatment C-1 and received Blina accordingly. The 2-year OS and LFS were 98.9% (95%CI: 92.5 to 99.8) and 85.6% (95%CI: 71.9 to 92.9) in ALL/MRD2023, compared to 89.6% (95%CI: 82.0 to 94.1) and 74.1% (95%CI: 64.7 to 81.3) in ALL/MRD2019, respectively (OS: p=0.07, LFS: p=0.69). Age-stratified analyses showed consistently superior 2-year OS and LFS in ALL/MRD2023 across all age groups (16–35, 36–55, 56–65 years), with OS: 100% (95%CI: not reached to not reached) vs 91.4% (95%CI: 78.7 to 96.7), 97.3% (95%CI: 82.3 to 99.6) vs 88.5% (95%CI: 72.2 to 85.5), and 100% (95%CI: not reached to not reached) vs 87.5% (95%CI: 65.8 to 95.9); and LFS: 87.3% (95%CI: 71.9 to 94.6) vs 71.3% (95%CI: 56.3 to 81.9), 90.9% (95%CI: 77.4 to 96.5) vs 73.6% (95%CI: 55.4 to 85.3), and 93.3% (95%CI: 61.3 to 99.0) vs 80.3% (95%CI: 58.8 to 91.4), respectively. Among MRD-negative patients after Treatment C-1, 2-year OS and LFS were 98.6% (95%CI: 90.4 to 99.8) and 92.0% (95%CI: 82.7 to 96.4) in ALL/MRD2023 vs 91.1% (95%CI: 82.3 to 95.7) and 76.8% (95%CI: 65.6 to 84.7) in ALL/MRD2019 (OS: p=0.13, LFS: p=0.57). Among MRD-positive patients after Treatment C-1, ALL/MRD2023 showed 2-year OS and LFS of 100% (95%CI: not reached to not reached) and 72.2% (95%CI: 41.6 to 88.6) compared to ALL/MRD2019 [85.3% (95%CI: 65.4 to 19.9) and 67.2% (95%CI: 65.4 to 94.2)] (OS: p=0.22, LFS: p=0.93). Conclusion Although the follow-up period remains relatively short and statistical significance has not yet been demonstrated, preliminary data suggest that the ALL/MRD2023 protocol with upfront blinatumomab administration and reduced-intensity chemotherapy may offer improved OS and LFS compared to the conventional intensive chemotherapy approach of ALL/MRD2019. Given the numerically superior outcomes observed across multiple age groups and MRD strata, the ALL/MRD2023 regimen represents a promising treatment strategy that warrants further validation through longer follow-up and mature outcome analyses. These findings support the potential of upfront Blina to enhance survival while minimizing chemotherapy-related toxicity in adult Ph– B-ALL.
Article Details
Authors (50)
Takahiro Shima
Koji Nagafuji
Toshihiro Miyamoto
Shuichi Ota
Yuna Katsuoka
5National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Sendai, Japan
Satoshi Yoshihara
Naoyuki Uchida
Senji Kasahara
Hiroki Hosoi
9Wakayama Medical University Hospital, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Wakayama, Japan
Mitsumasa Watanabe
Hitoji Uchiyama
9Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hospital, Hematology, Kyoto-shi, Japan
Junya Kanda
Takeru Asano
13Japanese Red Cross Society Himeji Hospital, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Himeji, Japan
Yuichiro Nawa
14Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Department of Hematology, Matsuyama, Japan
Ken Takase
15NHO Kyushu medical center, Department of Hematology, Fukuoka, Japan
Atsushi Satake
16Kansai Medical University, First Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka, Japan
Junya Kuroda
Tetsuya Eto
Yutaka Imamura
Yasuhiko Miyazaki
20Oita Prefectural Hospital, Department of Hematology, Oita, Japan
Akio Mori
21Aiiku Hospital, Blood Disorders Center, Sapporo, Japan
Satoshi Yamamoto
Takahiro Nagashima
23Japanese Red Cross Kitami Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine/ General Medicine, Kitami, Japan
Shinichi Masuda
24Japanese Red Cross Society Narita Hospital, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Natita, Japan
Yoshiki Nakae
25Nippon Life Hospital, Department of Hematology and Chemotherapy, Osaka, Japan
Hitoshi Minamiguchi
Osaka Keisatsu Hospital, Osaka, Japan
Yuta Katayama
Tatsunori Ishikawa
28Chugoku Central Hospital, Department of Hematology, Fukuyama, Japan
Shiro Fujii
29Tokushima University Hospital, Department of Hematology, Tokushima, Japan
Tomoaki Fujisaki
30Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Matsuyama, Japan
Katsuto Takenaka
Goichi Yoshimoto
32Saga Prefecture Medical Center Koseikan, Department of Hematology, Saga, Japan
Ilseung Choi
33National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Department of Hematology, Fukuoka, Japan
Masao Ogata
34Oita University Hpspital, Department of Hematology, Oita, Japan
Koji Kato
Naoki Harada
Mika Kuroiwa
37National Hospital Organization Fukuoka-Higashi Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Fukuoka, Japan
Masahiro Onozawa
20Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
Hisashi Yamamoto
1Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Hematology, Tokyo, Japan
Junichi Kitagawa
Taku Tsukamoto
1Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Noboru Asada
5Okayama University Hospital, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Okayama, Japan
Ryota Imanaka
42Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, Department of Hematology, Hiroshima, Japan
Kazushi Tanimoto
43Ehime University Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Toon, Japan
Shuro Yoshida
44National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Fukuoka, Japan
Yuichiro Semba
Yoshikane Kikushige
1Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Sciences, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
Yoshikiyo Ito
46Imamura General Hospital, Department of Hematology, Kagoshima, Japan
Takahiro Maeda
Koichi Akashi