Efficacy of tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine (TTC) following trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Updated results and subgroup analyses from the UNICANCER multicenter retrospective cohort.

J Jean-Sebastien Frenel J Jean Zeghondy C Catherine Guerin (ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France) A Audrey Mailliez (Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Cancer Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France) E Elsa Volant (Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France) F Francois Poumeaud (Université de Toulouse, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Department of Medical Oncology, Toulouse, France) A Anne Patsouris (Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Angers-Nantes, Angers, France) M Monica Arnedos C Caroline Bailleux (Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France) F Fanny Le Du (Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France) L Loik Galland (CGFL, Dijon, France) A Alexandre de Nonneville (Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France) S Severine Guiu Lahaye (Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France) B Barbara Pistilli (Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France) F Florence Dalenc (Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France) T Thomas Bachelot J Jean-Yves Pierga L Louis Larrouquere (Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France) D Delphine Loirat

Abstract

1030 Background: T-DXd is the standard second-line treatment for HER2-positive MBC with TTC being the preferred third-line option. However, the efficacy of TTC following T-DXd remains unclear. Here, we provide an updated and subgroup analysis of a French cohort comprising 101 patients who received TTC after T-DXd. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study across 12 French comprehensive cancer centers, including patients with HER2-positive MBC treated with TTC after T-DXd exposure. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Results: A total of 101 patients who initiated TTC between August 2020 and December 2022 were included in the analysis. The median age was 56.4 years (range: 30.8–84.8). Patients had received a median of 4 prior MBC therapies (range: 2–15), which included pertuzumab (81%) and T-DM1 (93%). 82 patients (81%) experienced progression on T-DXd, while 19 discontinued due to toxicity or other reasons. The data cutoff date was December 1, 2024. For the whole population, with a median follow-up of 29.6 months (95% CI [26.0–34.0]), the median PFS was 4.7 months (95% CI [3.9–5.8]), the median TTNT was 5.2 months (95% CI [4.5–6.6]), and the median OS was 13.9 months (95% CI [12.4–19.0]). For the 86 patients who initiated TTC immediately after T-DXd, the median PFS and TTNT were 5.2 months (95% CI [4.4–6.4]) and 5.5 months (95% CI [4.7–7.2]), respectively. HR+ disease was identified in 71.3% (n=72) of the cohort, with 84.7% receiving TTC immediately post-T-DXd. With a median follow-up of 29.6 months (95% CI [25.1–NR]), the HR+ population had a median PFS of 4.1 months (95% CI [3.5–5.6]) and a median OS of 13.4 months (95% CI [12.3–19.0]). The median TTNT was 4.7 months (95% CI [4.0–6.3]). Among the 65 RECIST-evaluable HR+ patients, best response included progressive disease in 40%, stable disease in 29%, partial response in 29%, and complete response in 2%. With a median follow-up of 29.3 months (95% CI [26.0–NR]), the HR- population had a median PFS of 5.8 months (95% CI [4.4–10.5]) and a median OS of 17.5 months (95% CI [10.6–22.9]). The median TTNT was 6.0 months (95% CI [4.9–10.7]). Among the 24 RECIST-evaluable HR- patients, best response included progressive disease in 25%, stable disease in 38%, partial response in 33%, and complete response in 4%. Conclusions: This large retrospective cohort with extended follow-up highlights the efficacy of TTC in HER2-positive MBC patients previously treated with T-DXd. These findings support the role of TTC as a viable treatment option post-T-DXd and provide insights for optimizing therapeutic strategies in this setting.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 1030-1030
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

J

Jean-Sebastien Frenel

J

Jean Zeghondy

C

Catherine Guerin

ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France

A

Audrey Mailliez

Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Cancer Unit, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France

E

Elsa Volant

Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France

F

Francois Poumeaud

Université de Toulouse, Oncopole Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Department of Medical Oncology, Toulouse, France

A

Anne Patsouris

Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest Angers-Nantes, Angers, France

M

Monica Arnedos

C

Caroline Bailleux

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France

F

Fanny Le Du

Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France

L

Loik Galland

CGFL, Dijon, France

A

Alexandre de Nonneville

Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France

S

Severine Guiu Lahaye

Montpellier Cancer Institute, Montpellier, France

B

Barbara Pistilli

Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

F

Florence Dalenc

Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France

T

Thomas Bachelot

J

Jean-Yves Pierga

L

Louis Larrouquere

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

D

Delphine Loirat