Efficacy of tgrx-678, a potent BCR::ABL1 allosteric inhibitor, in CML-CP and CML-AP patients harboring T315I mutation: Results from a phase 1 study

Q Qian Jiang (State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences) W WeiMing Li Y Yanli Zhang Q Qiang Wang S Suning Chen B Bingcheng Liu J Jie Jin (School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering) Z Zhenfang Liu (10Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China) Z Zhuogang Liu (1Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China) J Jianyu Weng (5Department of Hematology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China) X Xin Du (State Key Laboratory of Immune Response and Immunotherapy, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Center for Advanced Interdisciplinary Science and Biomedicine of IHM, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China) X Xielan Zhao (13Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, China) L Li Meng S Shujie Yan X xiaomeng Dong (14Shenzhen TargetRx Inc., Shenzhen, China) Y Yihan Wang (Engineering Research Center of Molecular & Neuroimaging, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology) J Jingrong Cao (1Shenzhen TargetRx, Inc., Shenzhen, China)

Abstract

Abstract Background: TGRX-678 is a novel allosteric inhibitor of ABL kinases that specifically targets the Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP) of ABL. Previous results showed TGRX-678 was well tolerated and demonstrated activity in patients (pts) with CML- chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) who are resistant/intolerant to prior TKIs (Jiang,et al. Blood (2024) 144 (Supplement 1): 477). The T315Imutation is common resistant in CML pts after multiple lines of TKI therapy. Here, we present updated data from phase 1 study in patients harboring the T315I mutation (NCT05434312). Methods: We included all the pts in CP or AP with T315I mutation detected by Sanger sequencing in phase 1 study, a single-arm study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of TGRX-678 CML. Results: As of June 17, 2025, 53 T315I-mutated CML pts (32 CP and 21 AP) were enrolled. 11 (21%) pts had additional ABL1 mutations. Doses of TGRX-678 included 40 mg/d (4 CP, 3 AP), 80 mg/d (6 CP, 4 AP), 160 mg/d (2 CP, 2 AP), and 240 mg/d (20 CP, 12 AP). 36 (68%) pts were male. Median age was 44 (IQR, 35-51) years. Median interval from CML diagnosis to starting TGRX-678 was 68 (IQR 29-149) months. 35(66%) pts received ≥ 3 prior TKIs; 24(45%) pts previously received ponatinib, olverembatinib, asciminib, and/or HS-10382 (STAMP inhibitor). 44 (83%) pts had BCR::ABL1 >10% at baseline. At the data cut-off, median TGRX-678 treatment duration was 17 months (range 8-28), treatment was ongoing in 19 (59%) CP and 11 (52%) AP pts. 23 pts discontinued treatment due to physician's decision (n = 10), consent withdrawal (n = 6), disease progression (n =5), treatment related adverse events (TRAEs, n =1), and drug-unrelated death (n =1). In efficacy-evaluable pts, 81% CP pts and 80% AP achieved complete hematological response (CHR) and major hematological response (MaHR), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidences of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR) were 48% (95%CI 33-61%) and 33% (20-46%), respectively. The corresponding 2-year duration of response (DOR) rates were 80% (95%CI 58-91%) for CCyR and 84% (95%CI, 59-95%) for MMR, respectively. The 2-year probabilities of progression free survival (PFS) and survival were 89% (95%CI 76-96%) and 89% (95%CI, 74-94%). Efficacy outcomes were comparable across T315I mutation status (single vs. compound mutations) and TGRX-678 dose levels (≤160 mg/d vs. 240 mg/d), with all p-values ranging from 0.258 to 0.547. The 2-year cumulative incidences of CCyR and MMR were significantly higher in the CP cohort compared to the AP cohort (59% [95%CI, 39–75%] vs. 29% [95%CI, 11–50%], P = 0.030; and 45% [95%CI, 26–62%] vs. 15% [95%CI, 3–34%], P = 0.040, respectively). Among patients with prior exposure to ponatinib, olverembatinib, asciminib, or HS-10382, the cumulative incidences of CCyR and MMR were significantly lower than in those without such exposure (26% [95%CI, 10–45%] vs. 66% [95%CI, 44–81%], P = 0.002; and 9% [95%CI, 1–25%] vs. 53% [95%CI, 32–70%], P = 0.002, respectively). However, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were comparable between groups. Grade 3/4 hematological TRAEs included neutropenia (28%), thrombocytopenia (25%), leukopenia (17%) and anemia (15%). Common (≥5%) non-hematological TRAEs were Common non-hematological TRAEs (all grade, mainly grade 1 - 2) were hypertriglyceridemia (42%), hypercholesterolemia (30%), alanine aminotransferase increase (26%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (23%), hyperuricemia (23%),γ-glutamyltransferase increase (21%), lipase increase (17%) and hyperglycemia (13%) Safety profiles were comparable across dose groups. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that TGRX-678 achieved strong efficacy in patients with T315I-mutated CML in chronic or accelerated phase, with no clear dose–response relationship observed. These results suggest that lower doses of TGRX-678 may offer comparable efficacy with potentially improved safety, particularly in heavily pretreated patients harboring T315I mutations.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 902-902
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (17)

Q

Qian Jiang

State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences

W

WeiMing Li

Y

Yanli Zhang

Q

Qiang Wang

S

Suning Chen

B

Bingcheng Liu

J

Jie Jin

School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering

Z

Zhenfang Liu

10Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China

Z

Zhuogang Liu

1Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

J

Jianyu Weng

5Department of Hematology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China

X

Xin Du

State Key Laboratory of Immune Response and Immunotherapy, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Center for Advanced Interdisciplinary Science and Biomedicine of IHM, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China

X

Xielan Zhao

13Xiangya Hospital Central South University, Changsha, China

L

Li Meng

S

Shujie Yan

X

xiaomeng Dong

14Shenzhen TargetRx Inc., Shenzhen, China

Y

Yihan Wang

Engineering Research Center of Molecular & Neuroimaging, Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology

J

Jingrong Cao

1Shenzhen TargetRx, Inc., Shenzhen, China