Efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in combination with capecitabine and temozolomide in neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

H Hafiz Muhammad Hannan Javed (4TidalHealth Peninsula Regional Medical Center, Salisbury, United States) Q Qamar Iqbal M Muhammad Kashif Amin (2The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States) A Amir Kasaeian H Hediyeh Alemi (1The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States) I Iman Oskouie (Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran) S Sarmad Zaman Warraich (3Medical University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain) I Iqra Anwar T Turab Muhammad (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) M Muhammad Umair Mushtaq (1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS) M Michael Vishal Jaglal (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) M Moazzam Shahzad (10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States)

Abstract

e16345 Background: The combination of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) and Capecitabine with Temozolomide (CAPTEM) is emerging as a promising treatment for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). PRRT targets tumor cells with radiolabeled peptides for localized radiation, while CAPTEM enhances antitumor activity and radiosensitization, demonstrating improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NETs patients. This study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy of the PRRT and CAPTEM combination in treating NETs. Methods: A comprehensive literature search on PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Embase was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. Of 589 articles, 5 studies reporting outcomes of NETs after treatment with PRRT and CAPTEM were selected for final analysis. Three studies were retrospective, and two were prospective trials. Data for Kaplan-Meier survival curves were extracted using Plot Digitizer and analyzed using the MetaSurvival package in R version 4.2.1. The inter-study variance was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird estimator proportions, and a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was extracted to compute a pooled analysis. Results: Our analysis included 127 patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) who received PRRT combined with CAPTEM. The median age was 55 (21-81) years and 60% were male (n = 76). Of 15 reported patients, 53% had an ECOG status of 0, and 47% had an ECOG status of 1. Pancreatic NETs were the most common 63% (n = 80) followed by bowel NETs 15% (n = 19). The liver was the most frequent metastatic site (60%, n = 77), followed by lymph nodes (21.2%, n = 27). Prior treatments included surgery (27%), somatostatin analogs (39%), chemotherapy (26%), and radiation therapy (6%). The median follow-up was 23.6 months (range 4.1–71). A complete response was observed in 9 patients (7%), with a cumulative partial response rate of 45% (95% CI: 0.24-0.66, p = 0.00) and a cumulative stable disease rate of 32% (95% CI: 0.22-0.43). Survival rates at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 93.35%, 87.50%, 84.62%, and 76.13%, respectively. The pooled median overall survival (mOS) was 47.36 months, with an estimated mean OS of 41.66 months (95% CI: 29.91–47.52). The pooled median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 28.66 months. Conclusions: The combination therapy of PRRT and CAPTEM has demonstrated promising efficacy in treating neuroendocrine tumors, significantly improving response rates and survival outcomes. However, further studies and larger clinical trials are needed to validate these findings and optimize treatment protocols.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

H

Hafiz Muhammad Hannan Javed

4TidalHealth Peninsula Regional Medical Center, Salisbury, United States

Q

Qamar Iqbal

M

Muhammad Kashif Amin

2The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States

A

Amir Kasaeian

H

Hediyeh Alemi

1The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States

I

Iman Oskouie

Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

S

Sarmad Zaman Warraich

3Medical University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain

I

Iqra Anwar

T

Turab Muhammad

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

M

Muhammad Umair Mushtaq

1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

M

Michael Vishal Jaglal

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

M

Moazzam Shahzad

10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States