Efficacy of neoadjuvant TCHP with primary empegfilgrastim (E) prophylaxis in HER2-positive early breast cancer (HER2+ eBC): Final results of the DEFENDOR SPECIAL study.
Abstract
e12651 Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is the current standard of care for treating HER2-positive breast cancer. Achieving a pathological Complete Response (pCR) – is a strong predictor of betteroutcomes. Dose reductions and delays may impair NAT efficacy in early breast cancer. Strategies to enhance pCR are needed. This prospective observational study assessed primary empegfilgrastim (G-CSF) prophylaxis impact on pCR in HER2+ early BC treated with neoadjuvant TCHP regimen. Methods: From April 2020 to September 2023, 105 patients (pts) with HER2+ eBC received NAТ: 6 docetaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab + pertuzumab + empegfilrastim (TCHP+E). E was administered 24h post each NAT cycle. The primary endpoint was relative dose-intensity (RDI), pCR (ypT0/is ypN0) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population was one of the main secondary endpoint (NCT04905329). Results: Median age was 52.4 years. Clinical stages II and III were present in 58.1% and 41% of patients, respectively; 59% had nodal involvement at baseline. Mean RDI of TCHP+E regimen was 96%. pCR was achieved in 72.3% of patients. RCB-I and RCB-II were observed in 6.6% and 15.2%, respectively. The highest pCR rate (87.8%) was in pts with HR-/HER2+ (3+) tumors (n = 33). Not a single case of febrile neutropenia was recorded; neutropenia Gr.4 – in 2 (1.9%) pts, Gr.3 – in 1 (1%) pts; thrombocytopenia Gr. 3, 2, 1 – in 1 (1%), 4 (3.8%), 32 (30.5%) pts respectively. Conclusions: The use of empegfilgrastim allows to provide 96% RDI. TCHP with empegfilgrastim shows high efficacy in HER2+ breast cancer across HR status and tumor stage. HER2 expression level is a significant predictor of pCR. Clinical trial information: NCT04905329 . Pathological complete response. HR +3-8 Allred Score (n=69) HR +7-8 Allred Score (n=47) HR + low3-6 Allred Score (n=22) HR -0-2 Allred Score (n=36) HER2 2 + / FISH + (n=10) HER2 3 + (n=95) IIA-IIIA stages (n=72) IIIB-IIIC stages (n=32) pCR, ypT0/is ypN0 46 (66,6%) 27 (57,4%) 19 (86,4%) 29 (80,6%) 4 (40%) 72 (75,8%) 54 (75%) 21 (65,6%)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (6)
Lyudmila Zhukova
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center Named After A.S. Loginov, Moscow, Russian Federation
Tansylu Ibragimova
Moscow Clinical Scientific Center Named After A.S. Loginov, Moscow, Russian Federation
Daria Filonenko
SBIH Moscow Clinical Scientific and Practical Center Named After A.S. Loginov of DHM, Moscow, Russian Federation
Inna Ganshina
Russian Cancer Research Center N.N. Blokhin, Moscow, Russian Federation
Andrey Lazarev
The Bonch-Bruevich St Petersburg State University of Telecommunications, St Petersburg, Russian Federation
Irina Sorokina
JSC BIOCAD, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation