Efficacy of Lu-PSMA–based treatment strategies in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

S Sapna Kumari (Wellspan Health York Hospital, York, PA) A Amna Bint I Munir (3North Alabama Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Florence, United States) S Saba Batool (Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX) N Noman Saleem (University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS) H Harroop Klair (North Alabama Medical Center, Florence, AL) A Arafat Shabbir (Jefferson Regional Medical Centre, Pine Bluff, AR) M Muhammad Kashif Amin (2The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States) M Muhammad Umair Mushtaq (1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS) M Moazzam Shahzad (10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States)

Abstract

e17114 Background: Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 (Lu-PSMA) has demonstrated significant survival benefit in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; however, its role in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remains under investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the efficacy of early integration of Lu-PSMA in high-volume mHSPC. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted from inception through January 1, 2026, using MeSH terms and keywords related to Lu-PSMA, PSMA radioligand therapy, mHSPC, and randomized trials. Randomized phase II trials comparing Lu -PSMA-based therapy with standard treatment in high-volume mHSPC and reporting progression-free survival (PFS) were included. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using a random-effects model. Pooled estimates were derived using the Freeman–Tukey transformation with Knapp–Hartung adjustment, implemented in R (version 4.5.2). Results: Two randomized phase II trials comprising 160 patients (Lu-PSMA n = 78; control n = 82) were included. In the post-docetaxel consolidation trial, 30 patients with synchronous high-volume mHSPC and residual disease after ADT plus docetaxel were randomized. Median age was 69 vs 68 years; ECOG performance status ranged from 0–2; and all patients had completed 6 prior docetaxel cycles. Lu-PSMA consolidation resulted in higher objective response rates (53% vs 7%) and greater achievement of undetectable PSA at 6 months (60% vs 13%), with no grade ≥3 toxicity. In the upfront sequential trial, 130 patients with de novo high-volume mHSPC received Lu-PSMA followed by docetaxel or docetaxel alone with ADT. The median age was 69 years; 91% had high-volume disease by conventional imaging, and 8% had visceral metastases. Undetectable PSA at 48 weeks was more frequent with Lu-PSMA (41% vs 16%), and Lu-PSMA was associated with longer PSA progression-free survival and radiographic progression-free survival. Grade ≥3 adverse events were similar between arms (29% vs 27%) and largely attributable to docetaxel. In pooled analyses, Lu-PSMA-based strategies significantly improved PSA progression-free survival (HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40–0.90; I² = 0%; τ² = 0) and radiographic progression-free survival (HR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34–0.92; I² = 0%; τ² = 0). Conclusions: Lu-PSMA-based strategies demonstrate promising clinical activity in patients with mHSPC, with consistent improvements in both biochemical and radiologic PFS across different treatment settings. These findings provide rationale for ongoing and future phase III trials of Lu-PSMA-based intensification strategies in this subset of patients.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

S

Sapna Kumari

Wellspan Health York Hospital, York, PA

A

Amna Bint I Munir

3North Alabama Medical Center, Internal Medicine, Florence, United States

S

Saba Batool

Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX

N

Noman Saleem

University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS

H

Harroop Klair

North Alabama Medical Center, Florence, AL

A

Arafat Shabbir

Jefferson Regional Medical Centre, Pine Bluff, AR

M

Muhammad Kashif Amin

2The Mikael Rayaan Foundation Global Research Training Institute (MRF GRTI), Kansas City, United States

M

Muhammad Umair Mushtaq

1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

M

Moazzam Shahzad

10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States