Efficacy of combined CD38 and PD-1 inhibition with isatuximab and cemiplimab for relapsed/refractory NK/T-cell lymphoma

S Seok Jin Kim J Jing Quan Lim (2National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore) S Sang Eun Yoon D Deok-Hwan Yang (1Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun-gun, Korea, Rep. of South) J Ji Hyun Lee S Sung Yong Oh (14Department of Oncology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, South Korea, Busan, Korea) Y Yoon Seok Choi S Seong Hyun Jeong (3Ajou University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology-Oncology, Suwon, Korea) M Min Kyoung Kim S Sung Nam Lim (10Department of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Baek Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea) J Junhun Cho B Bon Park K Kyung Ju Ryu S Seunghyun Choi (12Chemical and Biological Integrative Research Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea) Y Yoon Park (Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, Korea, Republic of) K Kerry May Huifen Lim (3Lymphoma Genomic Translational Research Laboratory, Cellular and Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore) N Nur Ayuni Binte Muhammad Taib (3Lymphoma Genomic Translational Research Laboratory, Cellular and Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore) C Choon Kiat Ong S Soon Thye Lim (2National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore) W Won Seog Kim

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of combining cemiplimab, an anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, with isatuximab, an anti-CD38 antibody, in relapsed or refractory extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (R/R ENKTL). The hypothesis was that CD38 blockade could enhance the antitumor activity of PD-1 inhibitors. Eligible patients received cemiplimab (250 mg on days 1 and 15) and isatuximab (10 mg/kg on days 2 and 16) IV every 4 weeks for 6 cycles. Responders then received cemiplimab (350 mg) and isatuximab (10 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for up to 24 months. The primary end point was the complete response (CR) rate based on the best response. Of 37 patients enrolled, the CR rate was 51% (19/37), exceeding the primary end point of 40%, and the objective response rate was 65% (24/37). After a median follow-up of 30.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.6-34.8 months), the median progression-free survival was 9.5 months (95% CI, 1.4-17.6 months), whereas the median overall survival had not yet been reached. Patients achieving CR received a median of 28 cycles (range, 4-33 cycles), and the median duration of response for responders (n = 24) was 29.4 months (95% CI, 15.4-43.4 months). Structural variations disrupting the 3’-untranslated region of PD-L1 and high programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression were observed in responders. Most adverse events were mild (grade 1-2), with grade ≥3 events (32%) and no treatment-related deaths. The combination of isatuximab and cemiplimab demonstrated sustained antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in R/R ENKTL. This phase 2 trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as number NCT04763616.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue 2
Published July 10, 2025
Pages 155-166
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (20)

S

Seok Jin Kim

J

Jing Quan Lim

2National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

S

Sang Eun Yoon

D

Deok-Hwan Yang

1Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun-gun, Korea, Rep. of South

J

Ji Hyun Lee

S

Sung Yong Oh

14Department of Oncology, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, South Korea, Busan, Korea

Y

Yoon Seok Choi

S

Seong Hyun Jeong

3Ajou University School of Medicine, Department of Hematology-Oncology, Suwon, Korea

M

Min Kyoung Kim

S

Sung Nam Lim

10Department of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Baek Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea

J

Junhun Cho

B

Bon Park

K

Kyung Ju Ryu

S

Seunghyun Choi

12Chemical and Biological Integrative Research Center, Biomedical Research Institute, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea

Y

Yoon Park

Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, Korea, Republic of

K

Kerry May Huifen Lim

3Lymphoma Genomic Translational Research Laboratory, Cellular and Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

N

Nur Ayuni Binte Muhammad Taib

3Lymphoma Genomic Translational Research Laboratory, Cellular and Molecular Research, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

C

Choon Kiat Ong

S

Soon Thye Lim

2National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

W

Won Seog Kim