Efficacy of anti-VEGF & anti-EGFRs in microsatellite instable (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer, Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study.
Abstract
e15507 Background: Mismatch repair deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) CRC tumors constitute of 5% of mCRC. Immunotherapy is a new standard, but it is difficult to give it all. 5FU based treatment with antiEGFRs in RAS/BRAF-wt or bevacizumab (B) is used in mCRC. Data is limited for the efficacy of B or antiEGFRs in dMMR/MSI-H mCRC due to small number of cases in CRC population in trials. Aims : Evaluation of prognostic factors & 1 st line 5FU based treatment with B/antiEGFRs efficacy in mCRC. Methods: dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients (pts) with 1 st line B/antiEGFRs were evaluated retrospectively. Results: 132 patients were included. Mutation rates were as 35.6% (n:47) for RAS, 12.1% (n:16) for BRAF.Median PFS was 10.9 (95%CI: 9.2-12.6) months. Median OS was 44 months (95% CI 26.23-63.03). 82 (62.1%) pts had primary tumor resection (PTR), 26 (19.7%) had PTR & metastasectomy. 17 (12.8%) de novo mCRC pts had maximal cytoreductive surgery (MCS). 14 (10.6%) pts had subsequent IO. In multivariate analysis, RAS/BRAF mutation status, MCS & subsequent IO are defined as prognostic factors for OS (p<0.01, p: 0.022, p: 0.005, respectively). No statistically significant survival (PFS, OS) difference was detected. Conclusions: dMMR/MSI-H mCRC is an entity with different tumor biology. We consider that dMMR/MSI-H mCRC pts with BRAF wt, MCS & subsequent IO have better outcomes with 1st line 5FU based treatment with B/antiEGFRs. Baseline characteristics & survival analysis. n(%) PFS(months) OS (months) Univariate analysis Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis %95 CI P value %95 CI P value %95 CI HR P value Age (year) 60(23-82) 0.86 0.62 <60 50 8.4-11.3 25.0-64.7 ≥60 72 9.8-15.1 17.4-71.8 Sex 0.55 Female 56(43.2) 7.5-14.7 6.7-58.5 0.59 Male 67(50.8) 7.5-12.4 26.9-62.3 Primary Tumor Location 0.045 0.036 Right 81(61.4) 7.9-10.7 24.7-85.6 Left 33(25) 9.1-15.8 16.0-73.7 Rectum 18(13.6) 9.2-12.6 15.9-44.0 De novo Metastasis 0.55 0.04 Yes 72(54.5) 9.2-12.6 21.1-68.1 No (recurrent) 60(45.5) 61.1-14.4 11.8-53.9 Mutation status 0.037 <0.01 2.72-20.05 7.9 <0.01 KRAS/NRAS mutant 47(35.6) 6.5-16.4 20.4-69.3 BRAF mutant 16(12.1) 5.7-12.0 0.0-23.5 RAS/BRAF Wild 69(52.2) 9.3-12.4 21.7-43.0 Site of Metastasis 0.092 0.053 Liver 62(46.9) 8.4-13.8 24.6-77.1 Peritoneum 30(22.7) 8.5-10.1 32.5-59.4 Others* 24(18.1) 2.5-20.1 18.5-44.5 Biological Treatment 0.089 No 34(25.7) 4.6-11.3 Bevacizumab 72(54.5) 9.7-17.1 Cetuximab 20(15.1) 10.2-14.7 Panitumumab 6(4.5) 2.7-19.9 Maintenance treatment 0.007 0.14 0.20-1.07 0.46 0.72 Yes 37(28) 12.4-15.5 29.9-80.4 No 95(71.9) 7.1-10.3 8.9-54.2 Maximal cytoreductive surgery 0.89 0.030 0.15-0.86 0.36 0.022 Yes 17(12.8) 6.8-11.0 15.0-50.2 No 115(87.1) 9.3-13.0 17.9-92.4 İmmunotherapy in Subsequent Treatment 0.005 0.28-0.51 0.12 0.005 Yes 14(10.6) No 118(89.4) 20.2-42.8 *Others: Lung, bone, brain, nonregional lap.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
İlknur Deliktaş Onur
Mutlu Doğan
Mehmet Akif Ozturk
Memorial Şişli Hospital, Ataşehir, Turkey
Taha Koray Şahin
Murat Kiracı
University of Health Sciences, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Ahmet Melih Arslan
Eda Karapeli̇t Agi̇toğlu
Necmettin Erbakan University, Meram Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Konya, Turkey
Beliz Bahar Karaoğlan
Nargiz Majidova
Elif Sahin
Sabin Goktas Aydin
SBU Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Abdullah Sakin
Ali Oğul
Emine Türkmen
University of Celal Bayar, Department of Medical Oncology, Manisa, Turkey
Kadriye Başkurt
Etlik City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara, Turkey
Zeynep Yüksel Yaşar
University of Health Sciences, Kartal City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, İstanbul, Turkey
Yakup Ergün
Esma Turkmen
University of Health Sciences, Kocaeli City Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, Kocaeli, Turkey
Şafak Yıldırım Dişli
Öztürk Ateş