Efficacy and tolerability of duvelisib in relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: A multicenter real-world analysis.
Abstract
7067 Background: Relapsed/refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a rare group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas with median survival at relapse of 6-10 months and few treatment options. Duvelisib is a g/∆ phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor approved in CLL and NCCN compendium listed in PTCL. In indolent lymphomas, concerns for cumulative duvelisib toxicity limit its use. In contrast, studies in R/R PTCL show duvelisib to be well-tolerated. Therefore, we sought to assess the efficacy and tolerability of duvelisib in a real world setting in R/R PTCL. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with R/R PTCL treated with duvelisib from 2012-2025 at 12 centers. Results: We identified 207 patients with PTCL: nodal PTCL with TFH phenotype (n=106, 51%), PTCL-NOS (n=78, 38%), ALCL (n=16, 8%), enteropathy associated T-cell lymphoma (n=4, 2%), NK/T-cell lymphoma (n=2, 1%), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (n=1, 0.5%). 90 patients (43%) were female. Median age was 64; median International Prognostic Index score 3. Median prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 1-9). 26% received frontline transplant (23% auto, 3% allo). 118 patients received single agent duvelisib; 89 patients received duvelisib in combination with other agents (66 romidepsin, 12 bortezomib, 4 azacitadine, 3 ruxolitinib, 4 other). Of patients with response data, ORR was 51% (94/186; 31% CR, 17% PR) with median OS 12 months. ORR in patients with TFH-phenotype vs. non-TFH phenotype was 60% and 41% respectively. ORR in patients treated with single agent duvelisib and duvelisib combinations was 46% (46/99; 29% CR, 17% PR) and 55% (48/87; 39% CR, 16% PR), respectively with no difference in OS. Median duration of therapy was 84 days; the most common reason for discontinuation was progression (41%, 76/186). 13% (25/196) underwent allo-SCT after duvelisib therapy. Toxicity data is summarized in our table. In patients receiving single agent duvelisib therapy, rates of cytopenia were lower (7% vs. 34%, p<0.001) and rates of colitis were higher (17% vs. 7%, p= 0.03). Conclusions: In this real world, multicenter analysis of patients with R/R PTCL treated with duvelisib-based regimens, the ORR of 51% was consistent with published trials. Duvelisib therapy was well tolerated and a minority required hospitalization for toxicity. This suggests that duvelisib is safe in patients with R/R PTCL who have poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Adverse Event Full Cohortn (%)n=207 Single agent n (%)n=118 Combination therapyn (%)n=89 Single vs. Combination p value SteroidGivenn (% full cohort) Hospitalizationn (% full cohort) Rash 41 (20%) 24 (20%) 17 (19%) 0.83 23 (11%) 6 (3%) Colitis 26 (13%) 20 (17%) 6 (7%) 0.03 20 (10%) 16 (8%) Pneumonitis 7 (3%) 4 (3%) 3 (3%) 0.99 5 (2%) 3 (1%) Cytopenia 38(18%) 8 (7%) 30 (34%) <0.001 * * Transaminitis 33 (16%) 21 (18%) 12 (13%) 0.40 * * Infection 66 (32%) 36 (31%) 30 (34%) 0.63 N/A 42 (20%) *Not available.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Priyanka Pullarkat
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
Kishan Kamlesh Patel
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Alison J. Moskowitz
3Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Omar Elghawy
2Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Stefan K. Barta
Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Josie Ford
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
Salvia Jain
2Jon and Jo Ann Hagler Center for Lymphoma, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
Lauren Shea
1The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Hematology & Oncology, Birmingham, United States
Shambhavi Singh
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
Jie Wang
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory, CAMS Key Laboratory of Translational Research on Lung Cancer, Department of Medical Oncology Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Beijing China
Fatima Tuz Zahra
1H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
Yumeng Zhang
Massachusetts Institute of Technology , , , ,
Neha Akkad
6MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Swaminathan P. Iyer
2Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Alexander Daniel Sanjurjo
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
Seda S. Tolu
Matthew Alexander Lunning
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
Bret Wankel
13University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, United States
Conner Liddle
University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT
Neha Mehta-Shah
3Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO