Efficacy and safety profile of inaticabtagene autoleucel in Chinese adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia who relapsed after their transplant: Insights from real-world data
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Limited therapeutic options are available for adult patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). With conventional therapies, the prognosis for such relapsed B-ALL cases remain dismal. However, CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has achieved high complete remission (CR) rates in this setting. Inaticabtagene autoleucel (Inati-cel) is a CD19- CAR T cell featuring a CD19 single-chain variable fragment (scFv) derived from an HI19a clone and a 4-1BB/CD3-ζ costimulatory domain. It has demonstrated a high minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate (85.4%) and an estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) rate of 55.2% (Wang Y. et al., Blood Adv., 2025). We report real-world data on Inati-cel use in patients with B-ALL who relapsed after HSCT, evaluating its potential to improve treatment outcomes. Methods We conducted a multi-institutional real-world study of Inati-cel (NCT06450067), enrolling patients treated from 2024 onwards. Key endpoints included OS, overall response rate (ORR), minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate, duration of response (DOR), relapse-free survival (RFS), and CAR-T-related adverse events (AEs). Both OS and RFS were calculated from the day of Inati-cel infusion. Results From January 8, 2024, to July 20, 2025, 156 patients received Inati-cel. Of these cases, 31 in post-HSCT relapses underwent efficacy and safety evaluations. Their median age was 36 years (range: 20–61 years). The patients were pretreated with a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range: 1–5 lines). Prior therapies included blinatumomab (38.7%) and inotuzumab ozogamicin (22.6%). Eleven (35.5%) had extramedullary relapses, including 7 with central nervous system leukemia. High-risk genetic alterations carried by the patients included Ph positivity (13, 41.9%), TP53 deletion or mutation (3, 9.7%), mixed-lineage leukemia rearrangement (3, 9.7%), and alterations in IKZF1 (5, 16.1%). The median infusion dose was 0.60 (range: 0.42–1.00) × 108 viable CAR-T cells. All but one patient received bridging therapy. The median interval from apheresis to reinfusion was 37 days (range: 20–98 days). With a median follow-up of 7.33 months (range: 0.85–16.93 months), the best ORR across all caese was 83.9%; among responders, the MRD negativity rate (assessed using flow cytometry) was 96.2%. Notably, of the 11 with extramedullary disease, the ORR was 72.7%. Post-infusion, Inati-cel expansion was observed even in caese with MRD-negative CR pre-infusion, peaking around day 14. The longest duration of detectability was 12 months post-infusion in a caes in sustained CR. Notably, detectable CAR-T cells were observed in some patients' cerebrospinal fluid. While the median OS and RFS have not yet been reached, the estimated 1-year OS, RFS, and DOR rates were 64.5%, 69.8%, and 83.2%, respectively. Patients with and without prior blinatumomab exposure had similar OS (p = 0.62) and RFS (p = 0.58); the same was true for prior inotuzumab ozogamicin exposure (p = 0.86 and p = 0.67, respectively). Among patients who received sequential maintenance therapy versus those who did not, the 12-month OS and RFS were 91.2% vs. 51.3% (p = 0.185) and 91.6% vs. 55.4% (p = 0.031), respectively. No cases underwent subsequent allo-HSCT while in remission. Subsequent maintenance therapies included tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; n = 6), low-dose chemotherapy (n = 5), and inotuzumab ozogamicin (n = 3). Two relapses were observed, both with CD19-positive patients. Five patients died: 3 from disease progression, 1 from infection, and 1 from unknown causes (more than 3 months after Inati-cel infusion). The most common AEs of special interest were cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The incidence rates of CRS and ICANS were 45.2% and 3.2%, respectively, while grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS occurred in 3.2% and 0.0%, respectively. In the 11 extramedullary patients, no ICANS and no ≥ grade 3 CRS occurred. All patients recovered without sequelae. ConclusionReal-world data demonstrate that Inati-cel exhibits excellent efficacy in patients with B-ALL who relapse after HSCT and in patients with active extramedullary disease; its safety was also established. Extended follow-up is warranted to fully characterize the long-term outcomes of Inati-cel use.
Article Details
Authors (18)
Fen Zhou
Yuhua Li
Ying Wang
Xi Zhang
Jianmin Yang
Xiaobing Huang
Jin Wang
Xianmin Song
1Department of Hematology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
Xinsheng Xie
1The 1st affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Li Wang
The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital Zhengzhou China
Jie Jin
School of Emergency Management, School of the Environment and Safety Engineering
Liye Zhong
12The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Aibin Liang
Zhenyang Gu
15Department of Hematology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
Shengli Xue
2The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Department of Hematology, suzhou, China
Er-Lie Jiang
3Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Tianjin, China
Baohong Ping
1Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Hematology, Guangzhou, China
Heng Mei
Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Hubei Provincial Clinical Medical Center of Cell Therapy for Neoplastic Disease, Wuhan, China