Efficacy and safety of tremelimumab plus durvalumab (STRIDE) versus durvalumab monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Z Zainab Sabir (Jacobi / North Central Bronx Hospital, Bronx, NY) M Muhammad Muneeb Khawar (King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan) O Omar Abdullah Gill (2King Edward Medical University, Internal Medicine, Lahore, Pakistan) Z Zainab Rauf (King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan) A Ali Naseem (King edward medical University, Lahore, Pakistan) A Ahmad Hassan M Muhammad Ali M Muhammad Bakhtiar (King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan) M Maryam Maqsood (5Rochester General Hospital - Rochester Regional Health System, Internal Medicine, Rochester, United States) H Hamza Sabir (Jacobi/North Central Bronx, Bronx, NY) S Saad Shams (University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK) Z Zainab Rafaqat (Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Campus, Oklahoma City, OK)

Abstract

e14577 Background: Durvalumab monotherapy and the STRIDE regimen (tremelimumab plus durvalumab) are approved immunotherapy options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While both have shown clinical benefit, direct comparisons are limited. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Scopus were searched systematically for relevant studies from inception to May 2025. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled for dichotomous outcomes using Mantel-Haenszel method with random effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² and χ² statistics. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool. Results: Three studies with 991 patients were included. No significant difference in 18-month survival between STRIDE and durvalumab (RR = 1.18, 95% CI:0.84–1.66; I² = 72%; P = 0.33). The overall response rate favored STRIDE (RR = 1.52, 95% CI:1.03–2.24; I² = 21%; P = 0.03). Partial response and complete response rates were also higher with STRIDE but not statistically significant (PR: RR = 1.44, 95% CI:0.99–2.09; I² = 17%; P = 0.06; CR: RR = 1.95, 95% CI: 0.82–4.68; I² = 0%; P = 0.13). Regarding safety, STRIDE was associated with higher risk of any-grade adverse events and grade 3 adverse events, (RR = 1.78, 95% CI:0.98–3.14; I² = 92%; P = 0.06 and RR = 1.92, 95% CI:1.37–2.68; P = 0.0001 respectively). There was no differences in liver toxicity (ALT: RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 0.46–5.25; I² = 79%; P = 0.56; and AST: RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.55–2.88; I² = 64%; P = 0.59) and diarrhea incidence (RR = 1.87, 95% CI: 0.75–4.68, I² = 69%; P = 0.18) between both groups. However, treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (RR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.07–3.46; I² = 0%; P = 0.03) were higher with STRIDE. Conclusions: STRIDE showed a significantly higher ORR than Durvalumab in advanced HCC, with comparable survival and manageable toxicity. However, further large-scale RCTs are needed to confirm these findings and establish STRIDE as a standard treatment option. Key Words: HCC, STRIDE, Durvalumab.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

Z

Zainab Sabir

Jacobi / North Central Bronx Hospital, Bronx, NY

M

Muhammad Muneeb Khawar

King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

O

Omar Abdullah Gill

2King Edward Medical University, Internal Medicine, Lahore, Pakistan

Z

Zainab Rauf

King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan

A

Ali Naseem

King edward medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

A

Ahmad Hassan

M

Muhammad Ali

M

Muhammad Bakhtiar

King Edward Medical University/Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan

M

Maryam Maqsood

5Rochester General Hospital - Rochester Regional Health System, Internal Medicine, Rochester, United States

H

Hamza Sabir

Jacobi/North Central Bronx, Bronx, NY

S

Saad Shams

University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK

Z

Zainab Rafaqat

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Campus, Oklahoma City, OK