Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in HR-negative HER2-low advanced breast cancer: A real-world, retrospective study.
Abstract
e15019 Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer (mBC), while most patients were hormone receptor (HR)-positive population. Limited data are available about its efficacy in HR-negative patients. We examined effectiveness and safety of T-DXd in HR-negative HER2-low mBC. Methods: This real-world, retrospective study included patients with pre-treated HR-negative HER2-low mBC who received at least one administration of T-DXd. The outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: From May 2022 and August 2024, a cohort of 50 patients were recruited, including 29 (58%) patients had primary HR-negative and 21 (42%) were converted by HR-positive disease. Eight (16%) patients were previously treated with anti trop-2 ADC, and 3 (6%) were treated with anti HER2 ADC. The median number of prior therapies for metastatic disease was 2 ( range 0–6). In the whole cohort, the ORR and DCR were 30% and 78%, and the median PFS and OS were 5.1 and 16.6 months. In subgroup analysis, patients with primary HR-negative mBC had the worse median PFS and OS compared with patients converted by HR-positive mBC, 3.8 versus 7.1 months, p = 0.002, and 11.9 versus 21.2 months, p = 0.02, respectively. Any-grade toxicity was registered in 44 (88%) patients. Most common AEs reported were nausea (68%), neutropenia (30%), and fatigue (36%). Grade 3/4 AEs were registered in 7 (14%) patients, including thrombocytopenia (10%), neutropenia (6%), leukopenia (6%), anemia (6%), drug-induced interstitial lung disease (2%), and nausea (2%). Conclusions: Efficacy and safety of T-DXd were confirmed in an unselected real-world population of HR-negative HER2-low mBC. These results are consistent with the results of known findings, and no new safety concerns were reported. Evaluation of efficacy. Treatment Response All patients(N=50) Primary HR-negative mBC(N=29) Converted by HR-positive mBC(N=21) ORR 15 (30.0) 6 (20.7) 9 (42.9) DCR 39 (78.0) 19 (65.5) 20 (95.2) Median PFS (95% CI) 5.1 (4.6-5.6) 3.8 (2.2-5.4) 7.1(1.7-12.5) Hazard ratio (95% CI) NA 2.76 (1.43-5.31) P value NA 0.002 Median OS (95% CI) 16.6 (10.8-22.4) 11.9 (6.7-17.1) 21.2 (12.4-30.0) Hazard ratio (95% CI) NA 3.49 (1.26-9.68) P value NA 0.02
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (9)
Mengqian Ni
Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
Guorong Zou
Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China
Qingru Zhou
State Key Laboratory of Advanced Separation Membrane Materials, College of Materials Science and Engineering Zhejiang University of Technology Hangzhou China
Lulu Zhang
Fei Xu
Zhongyu Yuan
Shusen Wang
Yanxia Shi
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
Xin An
Key Laboratory of Entomology and Pest Control Engineering, College of Plant Protection, Southwest University