Efficacy and safety of the ROCK2-inhibitor belumosudil for chronic gvhd treatment: Multicenter retrospective analysis of a large german-austrian cohort of the belumosudil managed-access program.
Abstract
Abstract Background: Chronic GvHD (cGvHD) is the most significant risk factor for late morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). There are no standard treatment options beyond first-line corticosteroids and second-line ruxolitinib. The selective ROCK-2 inhibitor belumosudil, a novel FDA-, but not yet EMA-approved agent, has shown efficacy in phase-2 trials and has recently been made available to German and Austrian patients within a managed-access program (MAP). In this study, we analyzed the clinical benefits of belumosudil within the MAP program in the German Austrian cohort. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study was performed within the German cooperative transplant group (KTS) and included 113 patients who received belumosudil in the MAP provided by Sanofi-Aventis. Fifteen German and one Austrian transplant center contributed data to this analysis. Patients could enter the MAP after at least two and a maximum of five prior lines of treatment (LOT) for chronic GvHD, which had to include ruxolitinib if not intolerant. Organ scoring and response assessment were performed according to the NIH-consensus criteria before start, and at month 1, 3, 6 and 12 thereafter. Events defining failure-free survival (FFS) are relapse, death or start of a new immunosuppressive agent. Adverse events are reported according to the CTCAE criteria (version 5.0). The last-follow-up was on July 31th 2025. Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism5 and SPSS 28.0. Results: In total, 113 patients (60% male) with a median age of 62 years (range, 20 – 77) were included into the analysis. Underlying diseases were acute myeloid leukemia (50%), myeloproliferative neoplasm (17%), myelodysplastic syndrome (15%), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (8%), lymphoma (6%) and other (4%). Initial cGvHD presentation was quiescent onset in 23%, progressive onset in 13%, and de novo onset in 63% of patients. The cohort had undergone a median of 3 prior LOT (range, 2 – 13). Ninety-three percent of patients were refractory to the previous treatment line. Patients had a history of ruxolitinib and ibrutinib pre-treatment in 93% and 12%, respectively. At belumosudil initiation, 81% of patients presented with severe cGvHD with a median of 3 NIH-defined organ manifestations (range, 1 – 7). Belumosudil (200mg qd and 200mg bd in 67% and 33% of patients) was started at a median of 47 months after alloSCT (range, 8 – 274) with a median treatment duration of 196 days (range, 14 to 856). The best objective response at one and three months was partial remission or better in 41 and 52 patients (36%, one complete remission, and 46%, one complete remission, one mixed response), respectively. Responses were observed across all organ systems. Stable disease was noted in 64 and 36 patients at one and three months (57 and 32%), respectively. At six months, 41 of 67 patients evaluable showed partial remission or better (61%, three complete remissions, one mixed response) and 17 patients were in stable disease (25%). Belumosudil treatment was discontinued in 21 patients (19%) and a new immunosuppressive medication was commenced in 15 patients (13%) over the complete observation time. Forty-four percent of patients were treated with steroids at belumosudil start. Steroid dose reduction was achieved in 17 of these patients (34%). FFS was 89,6%, 84% and 68,4% at three, six and 12 months. One-year overall survival was 91,5%. Treatment-emergent adverse reactions CTCAE grade III-IV were mostly infectious complications and occurred in 23 patients (20%). These adverse reactions included upper respiratory infections/ pneumonia (n=15), urinary tract infection (n=2), pneumococcal meningitis (n=1), mycobacterial infection (n=1), gastrointestinal infection (n=1), ARDS/ sepsis (n=1), herpes zoster (n=1) and EBV-reactivation (n=1). Non-infectious adverse events were diarrheal (n=1), non-melanoma skin cancer (n=1), epileptic seizure (n=1), apoplex (n=1), hypertensive crisis (n=1), mucous membrane hyperplasia (n=1) and one case of Grade IV pancytopenia without alternative cause resolving after belumosudil discontinuation. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis of a large real-world cohort demonstrates efficacy and safety of belumosudil in refractory chronic GvHD patients. Dynamics of organ response are currently under investigation. Further prospective trials are needed to determine the duration of response and the impact on GvHD-related mortality.
Article Details
Authors (27)
Udo Holtick
2University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Elisa Sala
4University Hospital Ulm, Department of Internal Medicine III, Ulm, Germany
Katharina Egger-Heidrich
Silke Heidenreich
From the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Mareike Verbeek
3Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Giuliano Filippini Velazquez
6Department of Hematology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
Christina Rautenberg
2University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Helene Schmeller
8Department of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation, Immune and Cell Therapy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Lasse Jost
9Division of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Immunotherapy, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
Tim Richardson
1Department I of Internal Medicine, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
Katrin Strauss
2Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
Franziska Taube
3Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Ina Rudolph
From the Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katharina Nickel
5Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Department of Medicine III, Hematology and Medical Oncology, Munich, Germany
Christoph Schmid
Augsburg University Hospital
Sara Jennrich
2West German Cancer Center and German Cancer consortium (DKTK partner site Essen), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Essen, Germany
Tobias A.W. Holderried
16University Hospital Bonn, Department of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation, Immune and Cell Therapy, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Bonn, Germany
Friedrich Stoelzel
11Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
Marius Dohse
10Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology, Carreras Leukemia Center, Philips University Marburg and University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany
Laurenz Steiner
1Department of Hematology and Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
Mohamad Yaakoub
12Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Halle, Halle, Germany
Normann Steiner
13Department of Internal Medicine V, Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, innsbruck, Austria
Olaf Penack
Darina Kodzhabasheva
15Department of Internal Medicine II, St. Johannes Hospital Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
Jochen J Frietsch
7University Hospital Würzburg, Internal Medicine II, Würzburg, Germany
Daniel Wolff
Matthias Fante
2University Hospital Regensburg, Department of Internal Medicine III, Hematology & Internal Oncology, Regensburg, Germany