Efficacy and safety of the DLL3/CD3 T-cell engager obrixtamig in patients with extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas with high or low DLL3 expression: Results from an ongoing phase I trial.

J Jaume Capdevila V Valentina Gambardella (Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain) Y Yasutoshi Kuboki (Department of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan) O Olatunji B. Alese (Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA) D Daniel Morgensztern (Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis) C Cyrus Sayehli M Miguel F. Sanmamed E Edurne Arriola (Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain) M Matus Studeny (Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim Am Rhein, Germany) M Mohamed Bouzaggou (Boehringer Ingelheim France S.A.S., Reims, France) Z Zhiheng Chen V Valeria Lifke (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an Der Riss, Germany) J Juergen Wolf (Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany) M Martin Wermke (National Center for Tumor Diseases–University Cancer Center Early Clinical Trial Unit, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany)

Abstract

3004 Background: Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is highly expressed in neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC). Obrixtamig (BI 764532) is a DLL3/CD3 IgG-like T-cell engager that targets DLL3-positive (DLL3+) tumors. NCT04429087 is an ongoing, Phase (Ph) I dose-escalation trial of obrixtamig in patients (pts) with DLL3+ pulmonary and extrapulmonary NEC (epNEC), who had failed to respond to standard treatment (Tx). This analysis examined the efficacy and safety of obrixtamig in pts with epNEC with high vs low DLL3 expression. Methods: Obrixtamig was given IV in 4 dose-escalation regimens (R): RA (fixed dose q3w); RB1 (fixed dose qw); RB2 (step-up dose, then qw) and RB3 (step-up dose, then qw for 3 weeks, then q3w), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Efficacy was assessed through objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) using RECIST v1.1. Results are reported for pts who received obrixtamig RB2 or RB3, categorized as having high vs low DLL3, using a threshold of ≥50% of tumor cells stained with an investigational antibody for DLL3 (SP347, Roche Diagnostics). Results: As of June 21, 2024, 60 pts with epNEC were included (gastroenteropancreatic [GEP]: 45.0%, genitourinary [GU]: 30.0%, other/unknown primary site: 25.0%); 30 each DLL3-high and DLL3-low. Mean age: 63.9 years in DLL3-high; 59.1 in DLL3-low pts. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced across DLL3 groups. All pts had received prior systemic therapy; 30.0% of DLL3-high and 50.0% of DLL3-low pts had received > 2 lines of prior Tx. Efficacy data are shown in the Table. After obrixtamig Tx, pts with high DLL3 expression had greater ORR, DCR, and duration of response (DoR) than DLL3-low pts. Responses were seen most frequently amongst pts with DLL3-high GEP (50.0%) or GU (60.0%) epNECs. Seven DLL3-high pts are still receiving Tx. Most treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) were mild to moderate for both groups (Table). Conclusions: Analyses from this ongoing Ph I study show greater obrixtamig efficacy in patients with epNEC with high DLL3 expression compared with low DLL3 expression, with a manageable safety profile that is comparable across both groups. The ORR of 40.0% and median DoR of 7.9 months in heavily pretreated epNEC tumors with DLL3 high expression are encouraging, and support further development of obrixtamig for this subgroup. Clinical trial information: NCT04429087 . Efficacy/safety parameter DLL3-high (n=30) DLL3-low (n=30) ORR, % (95% CI) 40.0 (24.6–57.7) 3.3 (0.6–16.7) DCR, % (95% CI) 66.7 (48.8–80.8) 26.7 (14.2–44.4) Median DoR (95% CI), months 7.9 (6.2–NC) 2.8 (NC–NC) TRAEs, all G/G ≥3, (%) 100.0/23.3 90.0/20.0 Cytokine release syndrome, all G/G ≥3, (%) 70.0/3.3 60.0/3.3 Neurotoxicity, including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome*, all G/G ≥3, (%) 16.7/6.7 10.0/3.3 *Evaluated with a customised MedDRA query. CI, confidence interval; NC, not calculable.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 3004-3004
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (14)

J

Jaume Capdevila

V

Valentina Gambardella

Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario, INCLIVA Biomedical Research Institute, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Y

Yasutoshi Kuboki

Department of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

O

Olatunji B. Alese

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA

D

Daniel Morgensztern

Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis

C

Cyrus Sayehli

M

Miguel F. Sanmamed

E

Edurne Arriola

Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

M

Matus Studeny

Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim Am Rhein, Germany

M

Mohamed Bouzaggou

Boehringer Ingelheim France S.A.S., Reims, France

Z

Zhiheng Chen

V

Valeria Lifke

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach an Der Riss, Germany

J

Juergen Wolf

Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

M

Martin Wermke

National Center for Tumor Diseases–University Cancer Center Early Clinical Trial Unit, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany