Efficacy and safety of pralsetinib in patients with advanced <i>RET</i> -fusion-positive NSCLC: Final data from the phase 1/2 ARROW study.

G Gilberto Lopes J Justin F. Gainor V Vivek Subbiah D Daniel W. Bowles (University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO) R Robert C. Doebele (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO) A Aaron Scott Mansfield (Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) C Christina S. Baik (Thoracic, Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle) S Shirish M. Gadgeel (Division of Hematology-Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit) G Gregory Peter Kalemkerian (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) S Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou (University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Orange) C Carlos Roberto Becerra (Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, CA) M Makenzi Colleen Evangelist (New York Oncology Hematology, Albany, NY) S Stephen V. Liu (Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC) J Jason M. Melear (Texas Oncology PA, Austin, TX) A Ashish Saxena A Amber Thomassen (11Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., South San Francisco, United States) S Sophia Wang (Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California Los Angeles) B Benjamin Besse

Abstract

8644 Background: RET fusions are targetable oncogenic drivers in 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). ARROW (NCT03037385) study results (final data lock May 20, 2024) supported the US FDA approval of pralsetinib, a highly potent, oral, selective RET inhibitor for metastatic RET -altered NSCLC. Here, we present final study results. Methods: ARROW was a phase 1/2 open-label study conducted at 84 sites in 13 countries. Phase 2 included patients with RET -fusion-positive NSCLC who received 400 mg pralsetinib once daily (QD). Initially, treatment-naïve patients were not candidates for platinum-based therapy and presented with several unfavorable prognostic factors; this requirement was removed by protocol amendment in July 2019. Primary objectives were overall response rate (ORR, per RECIST v1.1) and safety. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are reported in the full efficacy population; the measurable disease population (MDP) was the primary analysis population for ORR and duration of response (DOR). Results: 281 patients with RET -fusion-positive NSCLC received pralsetinib 400 mg QD, with a median duration of treatment of 14.95 months (mos). Median age was 60 years; 46% were male. In the MDP (n=259), ORR was 70.3% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 64.3, 75.8) and median DOR was 19.1 mos (95% CI: 14.5, 27.9; Table). In the efficacy population (N=281), median OS was 44.3 mos (95% CI: 30.9, 53.1) with median follow up of 47.6 mos (95% CI: 44.8, 49.2), and median PFS was 13.1 mos (95% CI: 11.4, 16.8). ORR (Table) and median PFS were markedly higher in the US (25.9 mos, n=64) vs. Asia (12.6 mos, n=122) or Europe (12.9 mos, n=95). In the safety population, 95% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 66% experienced ≥grade 3. Common TRAEs included increased AST (n=128 [46%]), anemia (n=121 [43%]), increased ALT (n=98 [35%]), and hypertension (n=77 [27%]). 3 patients died due to TRAEs (pneumonia, n=2; interstitial lung disease and rhabdomyolysis, n=1 each). No new safety signals were identified with this update. Conclusions: Pralsetinib produced clinically meaningful and durable responses in patients with RET -fusion-positive NSCLC (regardless of prior therapies) with a manageable safety profile, confirming with this longer follow up previously published results. Clinical trial information: NCT03037385 . All MDP(n=259) Prior Platinum (n=130) Treatment-naive(n=106) ORR, % (95% CI) Overall 70.3(64.3, 75.8) 63.1(54.2, 71.4) 78.3(69.2, 85.7) US (n=58)77.6(64.7, 87.5) (n=31)64.5(45.4, 80.8) (n=19)100(82.4, 100) Europe (n=89)65.2(54.3, 75) (n=36)63.9(46.2, 79.2) (n=43)65.1(49.1, 79) Asia (n=112)70.5(61.2, 78.8) (n=63)61.9(48.8, 73.9) (n=44)81.8(67.3, 91.8) Median DOR, mos (95% CI) a (n=182)19.1(14.5, 27.9) (n=82)31.8(15.1, 40.4) (n=83)13.4(9.4, 21.7) Median DOR follow up, mos (95% CI) 46.8(42.3, 50.2) 50.3(46.9, 56.8) 42.3(37.4, 44.2) a Per FDA censoring rule.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 8644-8644
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

G

Gilberto Lopes

J

Justin F. Gainor

V

Vivek Subbiah

D

Daniel W. Bowles

University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO

R

Robert C. Doebele

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO

A

Aaron Scott Mansfield

Department of Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

C

Christina S. Baik

Thoracic, Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle

S

Shirish M. Gadgeel

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health, Detroit

G

Gregory Peter Kalemkerian

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

S

Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou

University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Orange

C

Carlos Roberto Becerra

Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, CA

M

Makenzi Colleen Evangelist

New York Oncology Hematology, Albany, NY

S

Stephen V. Liu

Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC

J

Jason M. Melear

Texas Oncology PA, Austin, TX

A

Ashish Saxena

A

Amber Thomassen

11Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc., South San Francisco, United States

S

Sophia Wang

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California Los Angeles

B

Benjamin Besse