Efficacy and safety of olomorasib, a second-generation KRAS G12C inhibitor, plus cetuximab in <i>KRAS</i> G12C-mutant advanced colorectal cancer.

A Antoine Hollebecque (Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France) T Takafumi Koyama Y Yutaka Fujiwara Y Yonina R. Murciano-Goroff P Philippe Alexandre Cassier (Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France) N Natraj Reddy Ammakkanavar D Dustin A. Deming C Carlos A. Gomez-Roca (Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France) S Sae-Won Han (Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea) M Mohamedtaki Abdulaziz Tejani (AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL) A Anthony B. El-Khoueiry (University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles) N Nagla Fawzy Abdel Karim (Inova Schar Cancer Institute, University of Virginia, Fairfax, VA) S Samantha Bowyer (Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia) V Victor T.G. Lin (Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA) S Samuel McNeely (30Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States) X Xin Tian You (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) A Aaron Chen A Aaron Alan Fink (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) M Melinda D. Willard Y Yasutoshi Kuboki (Department of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan)

Abstract

3507 Background: Olomorasib, a potent and selective second-generation KRAS G12C inhibitor (G12Ci), has demonstrated promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in KRAS G12C-mutant cancers. Based on emerging nonclinical and clinical data, combining a KRAS G12Ci with cetuximab offers a compelling opportunity to improve outcomes in patients (pts) with KRAS G12C-mutant colorectal cancer (CRC). Here we report updated results from a phase 1/2 study (NCT04956640) on the safety, tolerability and optimal dose of olomorasib + cetuximab in pts with KRAS G12C-mutant CRC. Methods: Pts with advanced KRAS G12C-mutant CRC (tissue or plasma) previously treated with ≥1 prior oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing regimen were eligible and enrolled into dose escalation/expansion or optimization at 2 doses of olomorasib (100 and 150 mg, orally BID). Dose escalation of olomorasib + cetuximab followed a mTPI-2 method. Key objectives were safety and to determine the optimal dose of olomorasib + cetuximab. Antitumor activity per RECIST v1.1 was studied in pts with ≥1 post-baseline response assessment or who discontinued before a first response assessment. Results: As of 13 November 2024, 93 pts received olomorasib + cetuximab in dose escalation/expansion (n=49) or optimization (n=44). Median age was 58 yrs (range, 35-82) and median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 1-8). All grade TRAEs in ≥20% of pts were dermatitis acneiform (58%), diarrhea (38%), dry skin (31%), paronychia (28%), hypomagnesemia (26%), and rash (26%). The majority of TRAEs were grade 1-2, with grade ≥3 observed in 24% of pts. The most common TRAEs grade ≥3 were diarrhea, hypokalemia, and rash, each occurring in 2 pts. TRAEs led to olomorasib dose reduction in 2% of pts, olomorasib dose hold in 22% of pts, and cetuximab dose hold in 16% of pts. Of the 61 pts who discontinued treatment, 57 were due to PD. Two pts discontinued cetuximab due to TRAEs and continued on olomorasib. The AE profile was similar between doses. Median time on combination treatment was 6.5 mo (range, 0.8-24.1) and 32 pts remained on treatment. See Table 1 for efficacy data. Biomarker analysis will be reported. Conclusions: Olomorasib + cetuximab demonstrated similar antitumor activity and favorable safety at both dose levels in pts with KRAS G12C-mutant CRC, with the optimal dose of olomorasib + cetuximab determined as 100 mg BID. These results further support combining second-generation KRAS G12Ci with other anticancer therapies to improve outcomes in previously treated pts with KRAS G12C-mutant CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04956640 . Endpoint Olomorasib (100 mg BID) + CetuximabN=64 Olomorasib (150 mg BID) + CetuximabN=29 TotalN=93 ORR, % (n/N) 44% (28/64) 38% (11/29) 42% (39/93) BOR, n (%) PR 28 (44) 11 (38) 39 (42) SD 31 (48) 16 (55) 47 (51) PD 5 (8) 2 (7) 7 (8) mDOR, mo (95% CI) 8.3 (5.6-12.7) 6.2 (2.8-NE) 7.6 (6.0-12.2) mPFS, mo (95% CI) 7.5 (6.7-9.7) 6.6 (4.2-7.6) 7.5 (6.6-8.8)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 3507-3507
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

A

Antoine Hollebecque

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

T

Takafumi Koyama

Y

Yutaka Fujiwara

Y

Yonina R. Murciano-Goroff

P

Philippe Alexandre Cassier

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France

N

Natraj Reddy Ammakkanavar

D

Dustin A. Deming

C

Carlos A. Gomez-Roca

Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France

S

Sae-Won Han

Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea

M

Mohamedtaki Abdulaziz Tejani

AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL

A

Anthony B. El-Khoueiry

University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles

N

Nagla Fawzy Abdel Karim

Inova Schar Cancer Institute, University of Virginia, Fairfax, VA

S

Samantha Bowyer

Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia

V

Victor T.G. Lin

Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA

S

Samuel McNeely

30Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States

X

Xin Tian You

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN

A

Aaron Chen

A

Aaron Alan Fink

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN

M

Melinda D. Willard

Y

Yasutoshi Kuboki

Department of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan