Efficacy and safety of mixed formulation aprepitant and palonosetron (QLM2010) for prevention of cisplatin-based highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive-controlled phase III study.
Abstract
12147 Background: QLM2010, a novel fixed-dose intravenous antiemetic combination of aprepitant and palonosetron (PALO), can simultaneously antagonize 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 and neurokinin-1 receptors. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of QLM2010 plus dexamethasone (DEX) versus fosaprepitant (FAPR) combined with PALO and DEX for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, positive-controlled Phase III trial. Chemotherapy-naïve patients with solid tumors were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive QLM2010 (Day 1) or FAPR + PALO (Day 1) prior to cisplatin-based HEC, together with oral DEX (Days 1–4). The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR: no emesis/no rescue medication) during the overall (0–120 hours) phase. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups (QLM2010 group: n = 329; FAPR+PALO group: n = 331). The overall CR rate was 82.67% versus 80.97% (risk difference, 1.65%; 95% CI, −4.21–7.50%), confirming the non-inferiority of QLM2010 + DEX to FAPR + PALO + DEX. CR rates in both the acute (0–24 hours) and delayed (24–120 hours) phases were comparable between groups. Across all phases, the QLM2010 group showed similar rates to the FAPR+PALO group for no emesis, no nausea, no significant nausea, no rescue therapy, and complete protection (all P > 0.05). Notably, QLM2010 + DEX showed greater proportions of patients reporting no impact on daily life on Day 2 after treatment compared with FAPR + PALO + DEX (P = 0.0279). A single injection-site reaction (0.30 %) was confined to the FAPR+PALO group; none was observed in the QLM2010 group. The incidence of hiccups was numerically lower in the QLM2010 group compared with the FAPR+PALO group (8.2% vs. 15.1%). Conclusions: QLM2010 + DEX was non-inferior to FAPR + PALO + DEX for preventing CINV in cisplatin-based HEC patients and well tolerated, with the potential to reduce the impact of CINV on daily life. QLM2010 furnishes a novel, more convenient therapeutic alternative for the clinical management of CINV. Clinical trial information: NCT07081256 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Jieer Ying
Qingshan Li
Shuang Leng
Na Li
Chunling Liu
Pulmonar Medicine Ward II, The Affiliated Tumour Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China
Lin Lai
Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Magnetic Metallic Materials and Devices/Ganzhou Key Laboratory for Rare Earth Magnetic Functional Materials and Physics, College of Rare Earths, Jiangxi University of Science and Technology 1 , Ganzhou 341000,
Tienan Yi
Kaijian Lei
33Yibin Second People's Hospital, Yibin, China
Xisheng Fang
Oncology Department, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, Guangzhou, China
Songnan Zhang
Hailong Wei
Honglin Hu
Qiong Wang
Yanxia Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Fluorine and Nitrogen Chemistry and Advanced Materials, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 345 Lingling Road, Shanghai 200032, China
Xingli Gu
Yue Wang
Xiaojie Du
Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Jinan, China
Yuanyuan Li
State Key Laboratory of Flexible Electronics (LoFE) & Institute of Advanced Materials (IAM), Nanjing University of Posts & Telecommunications, 9 Wenyuan Road, Nanjing 210023, China
Xiangdong Cheng