Efficacy and safety of mevrometostat (M) in combination with enzalutamide (E) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Data from a phase 1 study.

N Nobuaki Matsubara (National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan) T Teresa Alonso Gordoa (Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain) V Víctor Moreno A Adanma Ayanambakkam (Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK) J Joan Carles (Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain) R Richard C. Frank (Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Nuvance Health, Norwalk, CT) K Kamil Kuć (Department of Oncology, St. Pio's Provincial Hospital, Przemyśl, Poland) I Irene Moreno F Fabricio Racca M Michael Thomas Schweizer (University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA) Q Qiang Wei (Shenzhen Geim Graphene Center, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Advanced Layered Materials for Value-added Applications, Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute and Institute of Materials Research) R Rajendar Mittapalli (Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA) J Jessica Tougias (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY) C Claudia Andreu-Vieyra (Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA) N Neelesh Soman (Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA) J Jayeta Chakrabarti (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY)

Abstract

e17043 Background: M is a potent and selective inhibitor of enhancer of zeste homolog 2. M 1250 mg twice daily (BID) on an empty stomach + E + androgen deprivation therapy showed improved outcomes vs E alone in pts with mCRPC, with a manageable adverse event (AE) profile, in the randomized, dose-expansion part of a phase 1 study (NCT03460977). We report efficacy and safety data from two pt cohorts (2A and 2C) who received M 875 mg BID with food + E. Methods: Pts with mCRPC who received prior abiraterone and/or E (2A) or prior abiraterone (2C), ≤1 prior chemotherapy in any setting, with evidence of progression per modified Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria were included. Primary endpoints were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per investigator assessment and safety. Secondary endpoints included objective response (OR) by RECIST 1.1 (for pts with measurable disease at baseline) and decline in prostate-specific antigen of ≥50% from baseline (PSA 50 ). Results: As of September 1, 2025, 29 pts had received M 875 mg BID with food + E (2A, n = 15; 2C, n = 14). Median (range) age was 74 (61–86) years in 2A and 73 (55–83) years in 2C. In 2A, 9 pts (60.0%) had received abiraterone and 9 pts (60%) had received E; in 2C, 14 pts (100%) received prior abiraterone and were E naive. Efficacy and safety outcomes for 2A and 2C are shown (Table). Six confirmed events (5 progressive disease,1 death) were observed in 2A and 4 (all progressive disease) in 2C; median (90% confidence interval [CI]) rPFS was 14.3 (2.0, not estimable [NE]) months in 2A and NE (6.2, NE) months in 2C. Confirmed PSA 50 was observed in 6 pts (40.0%; 95% CI 16.3, 67.7) in 2A and 6 pts (42.9%; 95% CI 17.7, 71.1) in 2C. In pts with measurable disease at baseline (2A, n = 4; 2C, n = 6), confirmed OR rate (95% CI) was 25.0% (0.6, 80.6; 1 partial response) in 2A and 16.7% (0.4, 64.1; 1 partial response) in 2C. For 2A+2C combined, most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were diarrhea (48.3%), thrombocytopenia (48.3%), and decreased appetite (44.8%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs were observed in 41.3% pts (most common: thrombocytopenia, anemia, asthenic conditions, and hypokalemia). Grade ≥3 TEAEs considered related to M were reported in 31.0% pts. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: M 875 mg BID with food + E shows promising outcomes in pts with mCRPC and a manageable AE profile. Further investigation of M + E in pts with mCRPC is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT03460977 . 2A(n=15) 2C(n=14) 2A + 2C(n=29) Efficacy Median rPFS (90% CI), months 14.3 (2.0, NE) NE (6.2, NE) – OR (95% CI), % 25.0 (0.6, 80.6) 16.7 (0.4, 64.1) – PSA 50 (95% CI), % 40.0 (16.3, 67.7) 42.9 (17.7, 71.1) – Safety, n (%) Any TEAE 15 (100) 14 (100) 29 (100) Grade ≥3 6 (40.0) 6 (42.9) 12 (41.4) TEAE related to M 15 (100) 13 (92.9) 28 (96.6) Grade ≥3 4 (26.7) 5 (35.7) 9 (31.0)

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

N

Nobuaki Matsubara

National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan

T

Teresa Alonso Gordoa

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

V

Víctor Moreno

A

Adanma Ayanambakkam

Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences, Oklahoma City, OK

J

Joan Carles

Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain

R

Richard C. Frank

Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Nuvance Health, Norwalk, CT

K

Kamil Kuć

Department of Oncology, St. Pio's Provincial Hospital, Przemyśl, Poland

I

Irene Moreno

F

Fabricio Racca

M

Michael Thomas Schweizer

University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA

Q

Qiang Wei

Shenzhen Geim Graphene Center, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Advanced Layered Materials for Value-added Applications, Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute and Institute of Materials Research

R

Rajendar Mittapalli

Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA

J

Jessica Tougias

Pfizer Inc., New York, NY

C

Claudia Andreu-Vieyra

Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA

N

Neelesh Soman

Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA

J

Jayeta Chakrabarti

Pfizer Inc., New York, NY