Efficacy and safety of mesutoclax (ICP-248) in combination with orelabrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies: A pooled analysis.

Z Zhiming Li K Keshu Zhou (3the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China) F Fei Li H Hongmei Jing S Shuhua Yi (4State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China) W Wei Yang Y Yanli Yang L Liqun Zou Z Zunmin Zhu A Aijun Liao W Wenjuan Yu H Hongling Peng F Fang Zhou (Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) S Stephen Yang Liang (Department of Hematologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China) X Xiaobing Huang X Xiaohan Li N Nuo Chen W Weige Wang (16InnoCare Pharma Limited, Beijing, Beijing, China) R Renbin Zhao (16InnoCare Pharma Limited, Beijing, Beijing, China) L Lugui Qiu

Abstract

7073 Background: Mesutoclax (ICP-248) is a next-generation BCL2 inhibitor, and orelabrutinib is a marketed BTK inhibitor for CLL/SLL, MCL, and MZL. However, the clinical activity of their combination in these malignancies remains undefined. This analysis evaluated the combination of mesutoclax and orelabrutinib across B-cell malignancies. Methods: Patients with relapsed and refractory (R/R) MCL, MZL were enrolled in a phase 1 study (NCT05728658), and treatment-naive (TN) CLL/SLL were enrolled in a phase 2 study (NCT06378138). R/R MCL and MZL patients received continuous daily mesutoclax (125 mg) and orelabrutinib (150mg) from cycle 1 day 1 continuously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. For CLL/SLL patients, induction therapy with orelabrutinib (150 mg QD, Cycles 1-17) was administered first, followed by mesutoclax (100 mg or 125 mg QD, Cycles 3-14). The orelabrutinib treatment continued beyond cycle 17 if the uMRD (≤10-4) was not achieved. Mesutoclax was implemented with a ramp-up schedule in all patients to mitigate the risk of TLS. Results: As of 05 Jan 2026, 60 patients were enrolled and treated in the studies: 8 R/R MCL, 10 R/R MZL, and 42 TN CLL/SLL (mesutoclax 100 mg, n=21; 125 mg, n=21). In R/R patients, the median number of prior lines of therapy was 1 (1-4). 6 (33.3%) were refractory to the last line of therapy. For TN CLL/SLL, 76.2% (32/42) of patients had moderate or high TLS risk, and 14.3% (6/42) had TP53 mutation or del (17p). Among 5 MCL and 8 MZL patients who had at least one disease evaluation, the overall response rate (ORR) was 100%, with CRR of 100% and 50%, respectively. Five patients (38.5%) achieved peripheral blood (PB) uMRD. In the 21 CLL/SLL patients receiving mesutoclax 125 mg, the ORR was 100% and the CRR was 38.1%, and the peripheral blood uMRD rate at 36-week was 65%. The median time to CR was 3.7 months in R/R group and 7.1 months in TN group. The 12-month PFS rate was 100% in CLL/SLL, while data for MCL and MZL are immature due to short follow-up. As the safety data cutoff (31 Dec 2025), the combination of mesutoclax and orelabrutinib was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile, and no new safety signals were identified compared to either agent as monotherapy. Most TEAEs were grade 1-2, with no TEAEs leading to drug discontinuation or death reported. The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs include neutrophil count decreased (35%), platelet count decreased (11.7%). Notably, no grade ≥3 anemia was reported. No clinical or laboratory TLS occurred. Conclusions: Mesutoclax in combination with orelabrutinib demonstrated a tolerable safety profile across B cell malignancy subtypes (MCL, MZL, CLL/SLL). Significant 100% ORR and deep response were observed in patients receiving mesutoclax 125mg combined with orelabrutinib. This all oral, chemo-free regimen has the potential to establish a novel therapeutic option for B-NHLs. Clinical trial information: NCT05728658 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 7073-7073
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

Z

Zhiming Li

K

Keshu Zhou

3the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China

F

Fei Li

H

Hongmei Jing

S

Shuhua Yi

4State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China

W

Wei Yang

Y

Yanli Yang

L

Liqun Zou

Z

Zunmin Zhu

A

Aijun Liao

W

Wenjuan Yu

H

Hongling Peng

F

Fang Zhou

Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

S

Stephen Yang Liang

Department of Hematologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

X

Xiaobing Huang

X

Xiaohan Li

N

Nuo Chen

W

Weige Wang

16InnoCare Pharma Limited, Beijing, Beijing, China

R

Renbin Zhao

16InnoCare Pharma Limited, Beijing, Beijing, China

L

Lugui Qiu