Efficacy and safety of less frequent dosing with elranatamab (ELRA) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): A US subgroup analysis from MagnetisMM-3.
Abstract
7549 Background: The ongoing phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359) study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ELRA in patients (pts) with RRMM and no prior BCMA-directed therapy (Cohort A). With a median follow‐up of 33.9 mo, ORR was 61.0%, mPFS was 17.2 mo, and mOS was 24.6 mo. Here we report results for the subgroup of pts enrolled in MagnetisMM-3 in the US. Methods: Eligible pts had RRMM with disease refractory to ≥1 immunomodulatory drug, ≥1 proteasome inhibitor, and ≥1 anti-CD38 antibody. Pts were given subcutaneous ELRA as step-up priming doses followed by 76 mg QW for 6 cycles. Pts given QW dosing for ≥6 cycles who achieved partial response or better lasting ≥2 mo were transitioned to Q2W dosing and to Q4W after ≥6 cycles of Q2W dosing. The subgroup of pts within Cohort A enrolled in the US (n=47) was analyzed. As of the data cutoff date (September 10, 2024), the median follow‐up was 33.8 mo (95% CI, 32.9-35.7; estimated by reverse Kaplan–Meier), approximately 32 mo after the last pt first dose. Results: Pts in the US subgroup received a median of 5 prior lines of therapy (range, 2-22); 93.6% were triple-class refractory, and 46.8% were penta-drug refractory. Eight (17.0%) pts were Black or African American. ORR (95% CI) by Blinded Independent Central Review was 66.0% (50.7-79.1); 42.6% of pts achieved complete response (CR + stringent CR). Median (range) time to response was 1.08 mo (0.95-7.36), and median time to CR or better was 4.76 mo (1.22-12.75). Median duration of response (95% CI) was not reached (NR) (24.0 mo-not estimable [NE]); the probability of maintaining response at 30 mo (95% CI) was 65.7% (43.3-81.0). Median (95% CI) PFS was 27.3 mo (4.3–NE). Median (95% CI) OS was NR (14.9–NE); the probability of survival at 30 mo (95% CI) was 55.8% (40.1-68.9). Any grade [G] and G3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 100% and 78.7% pts, respectively. Infections (any G, G3/4, G5) were reported in 70.2%, 40.4%, and 0.0%, respectively; 51.1% received Ig replacement. Anti-viral, anti-pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, anti-bacterial, and anti-fungal prophylaxis were received by 80.9%, 21.3%, 14.9%, and 8.5% of pts, respectively. The rate of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was 61.7% (G1, 34.0%; G2, 27.7%; G≥3, 0.0%). Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was reported in 8.5% of pts (G1, 4.3%; G2, 4.3%; G≥3, 0.0%). 22 pts switched from QW to Q2W, and 8 pts further switched from Q2W to Q4W dosing. Conclusions: The pts with RRMM enrolled in MagnetisMM-3 Cohort A, including the US subgroup, were heavily pretreated. Consistent with overall Cohort A data, ELRA was associated with deep, durable responses in the US subgroup, with a mPFS of 27.3 mo. CRS was G1 and G2 only. Infections were consistent with what was observed in the overall study population; infection prophylaxis including Ig replacement are recommended. Clinical trial information: NCT04649359 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (11)
Ajay K. Nooka
Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta
Christopher Sun Strouse
Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA
Sarah Marie Larson
UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica, CA
Alexander M. Lesokhin
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Asya Varshavsky Yanovsky
1Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, United States
David H. Vesole
John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ
Guenther Koehne
5Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL
Elpitha Soussou
Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY
Sharon T. Sullivan
12Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
Eric Leip
11Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, United States
Noopur S. Raje
1Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA