Efficacy and safety of ifosfamide and mesna in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after taxane-based chemotherapy and novel hormonal therapy failure.
Abstract
174 Background: Limited treatment options exist for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after the failure of taxane-based chemotherapy and novel hormonal therapy. Here, we report the safety and efficacy of ifosfamide and mesna in patients with mCRPC after the failure of taxane-based chemotherapy and novel hormonal therapy (NCT06236789). Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer who had failed taxane-based chemotherapy and novel hormonal therapy received ifosfamide 2,500 mg/m2 and mesna 1,500 mg/m2 on days 1–3, repeated every 21 days. Safety, objective response rate, disease control rate, reduction in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration by >50% (PSA50) or >90% (PSA90), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: A total of 47 patients with mCRPC were included in the study. The median number of lines of treatment was 5 (range: 3–7). All patients were previously administered docetaxel and novel hormonal therapies including abiraterone (51.1%) and/or enzalutamide (61.7%). Thirty-eight patients (80.9%) were administered cabazitaxel. The objective response and disease control rates were 21.3% and 80.9%, respectively. PSA50 and PSA90 were achieved in 31.9% and 10.6%, respectively. During a median follow-up duration of 54.3 months, rPFS and OS were 5.0 and 9.0 months, respectively. All the patients experienced treatment-related adverse events of any grades; however, no new safety signs were detected. Genomic biomarker analysis revealed that alterations in the TP53 pathway were associated with inferior rPFS and OS. Conclusions: Ifosfamide and mesna showed appreciable efficacy and manageable safety profiles in heavily treated patients with mCRPC, warranting further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT06236789 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (16)
Chang Gon Kim
Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Yeo Gyeong Ko
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Jongjin Yoon
Department of Radiology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonesi University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Chung Lee
Department of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Seung-Hoon Beom
Young Deuk Choi
Department of Urology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonesi University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Woong Kyu Han
Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Won Sik Ham
Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Hyunho Han
Department of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Jongsoo Lee
Ji Eun Heo
Daeseong Kim
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Eunsil Baek
Songdang Institute for Cancer Research, Yonesi University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Sang Woo Kim
Minsun Jung
Sang Joon Shin
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Seoul, South Korea